Discover the Secrets
to Developing Serious Strength Using Infrequent Workouts
I have long been
a fan of high-frequency training (HFT), and I will continue to sing its praises,
as I think it might be the best form of training—when done correctly—for
natural bodybuilders and lifters who want to gain as much strength and
muscle mass in the shortest time possible.
If you have read even a few articles and essays here on my blog, then
you probably know this already. What you
might not know is that I also believe you can build a tremendous amount
of strength and power utilizing low-frequency, high-volume workouts when, once
again, they are done correctly. So, read
on and discover my tips for making this kind of training work for you.
This article was
precipitated by an email I received—as are, probably, 1/3 of my essays—from a reader
who had a particular question. I’ll
leave out all of the odd little details and tidbits, but the email—and the
question it held—went something like this: “Hey, CS, I know you’re a fan of
high-frequency training and everything, but I can only make it to the gym once
every 2 or 3 days per week. I work
rotating shifts in a factory, sometime as long as 12, or even 16, hour shifts—I
usually put in around 60 hours a week.
It makes it hard to get to the gym very often. But I would like to compete in powerlifting
and wondered if there is any way to build strength by training infrequently. I think I have some ideas of different
training plans I could try based on some of your articles dealing with high-set,
low-rep workouts, but I wanted to get your input. Is there a good workout plan that would allow
me to get really strong with low-frequency training?”
Before we get
into the advice that I gave our dear reader, I want to make a couple of things
clear regarding both HFT and different workout plans. First off, I’m not a “one size fits all” sort
of trainer/strength writer. I don’t like
any kind of “tribal mentality” where one form of lifting is superior to all
others. I think that’s just shortsighted
at best, and downright bone-headed—to use some homespun vernacular—at
worst. A training plan should be
selected based on the lifter’s age, gender, goals, genetics, lifestyle, etc. Second, I am fond of HFT, as I wrote
at the outset here, because I think for the majority of natural lifters,
it’s the best form of training when your goals are both muscle mass and
strength. However, there are lifters who
should not utilize HFT. If you are
trying to not gain weight, for example, in order to stay in your weight class
for powerlifting, you probably shouldn’t use a HFT program. I have written about this several times
before, but one of the “problems” I had when utilizing Sheiko was that I
gained weight even when I tried my best to not gain weight. (This is also the reason that it should
be used by natural bodybuilders and lifters looking to pack on the pounds.)
When designed
properly, a low-frequency program can be great for lifters who are only, or at
least primarily, after strength above all else.
With that in mind, let’s look at some of the pros and cons of this form
of lifting, which will allow you to decide whether this form of power training
is right for you.
The first “plus” is
what I have already mentioned: it allows you to not gain weight while
adding strength. When you train with a
lot of sets but utilize really low reps coupled with a lot of rest between
training days—we’ll get around to exact details shortly—you can build, really,
a heaping amount of strength. But
this first plus is also the first con. Infrequent
training simply isn’t a good method for the majority of lifters if their goal
is to gain muscle mass. And by “majority”
I mean natural lifters. Steroids
change the equation—and change it big time. Anabolic steroid use is often cited as the
reason why bodybuilders from the ‘70s, ‘80s, and early ‘90s (before Dorian
Yates came onto the scene) were able to train with a lot of volume and a lot of
frequency. And, yeah, sure, steroids do
allow you to do more work and recover quicker.
But here’s the other side of it: they also allow you to train
very infrequently and never leave the “anabolic state” initiated by a good
workout. This means that, for steroid
users, a really high-volume, high-intensity program—although “intensity” here
is used as it is by bodybuilders, as how much effort is exerted in a
single set—done infrequently might just be the best form of training to
utilize. I would argue that it’s the
reason for the current mass monsters—“mutants” might be a better word for
them—that occupy today’s (unhealthy) pro bodybuilding scene. However, even steroid users probably wouldn’t
gain much muscle if they used the kind of high-volume programs I have in mind
here. The reps would just be too low to induce
hypertrophy. (By the way, you most
certainly can build muscle using high-set, low-rep routines, but they
have to be performed frequently, and that’s not within the purvey of what’s
being discussed in this essay.)
If you want to be
lean, incredibly strong, not to mention dense in appearance, this is
also a good way to train. Multiple sets
of really low reps done for high intensity—and here I mean intensity as
it’s used by strength athletes, as a percentage of your one-rep maximum—creates
muscles that aren’t just strong but are dense and thick in appearance. Infrequent, low rep, high set strength
programs build hard and wiry physiques.
This form of
training can be good for older powerlifters who still compete. Older athletes don’t need to be heavier
anyway, so the fact that the low frequency is a poor way to build muscle won’t
be a problem. Older powerlifters need to
give their bodies more rest (if they are going to train heavy) compared to their
younger counterparts, so taking two days (or more) off after every workout is a
good idea. But, once again, this might
not be the best way for older bodybuilders to train. I think older lifters who aren’t still
competing would do better with more frequent workouts coupled with sets of
higher reps. This is exactly the way
that Bill Starr trained as he got older.
His body couldn’t handle the heavy “pounding” it took from sets of 5
reps or less, but it most certainly could handle 6 days of full-body
workouts done for really high reps.
And, although this isn’t the space for it here (perhaps I will go into
detail in a future “ageless bodybuilding” piece), that’s also the approach
taken by Bill Pearl when he got older.
He would do multiple full-body workouts each week done for sets of 20
reps or higher on each exercise. You can
add the likes of Scott Abel and the legendary Jack LaLanne to that list—they
trained in much the same manner as they aged.
One more con of
this form of training—and this might not seem obvious at first—is that it’s not
good for athletes. I write that this may
seem odd since infrequent training would appear to be good for the
athlete since it allows her to devote more time to her sport due to the additional
rest days. But this kind of training
doesn’t condition your body to handle more work or to train while not fully
recuperated—two essential elements for any athlete. In fact, the infrequent training will make
you quite sore and will often keep you sore. This is because, with low-frequency training,
one never conditions himself to handle more and more work. Instead, an athlete needs to use a more HFT
regimen during the off-season and then he does need to move to a
low-frequency program in-season, but the in-season training should be done for far
less volume than what is recommended here.
The caveat, of course, is if you are a strength athlete such as a
powerlifter because, in this case, the training itself mirrors your sport
almost exactly.
Another benefit
of infrequent training is that it allows you to utilize dynamic effort training
or speed work. I’m a fan of speed
training but it’s not easy to program it into a HFT regimen. It simply takes too much of a toll on your
central nervous system. It can be used at
times with HFT, assuming the lifter doesn’t use it for more than a few-week
training block, but it’s best used by lifters who are after strength and
train infrequently. Lots of heavy sets
of low reps combined with days that have plenty of sets trained using the dynamic
effort method is probably the best route for low-frequency strength
training—which brings us around to why you started reading this article in the
first place: the actual training. What
follows is essentially the same thing that I told our reader who emailed me.
There is most
certainly a good workout plan that will allow you to get really strong
while training with low frequency. The
only thing that is required, however, is the ability to stay in the gym for an
extended period when you do train.
I will use a
powerlifting training template as our example for how to set up an effective
training regimen, as that was how this question was originally proposed.
Train your squat
and your deadlift together on one training day.
Train your bench press separately on another day. Take two days off between each training day. If you want to train on the exact same days
each week—say, Monday and Thursday, for example—then just squat and deadlift on
the Monday workout and bench press on the Thursday session.
Rotate between
three separate workouts for each day.
One day, you will do ramps, working up to a near max attempt on
your lift. One day will be devoted to
the dynamic effort method. And another
day will be devoted to multiple sets of low reps with around 85% of your max.
On the “ramps”
day, do ramps of 5s, 3s, and singles, taking your time to work up to a heavy, almost
max single. When I write “almost,” I
want you to leave a little something “in the tank.” At least, most of the time. Once every 6 weeks or so, go for an all-out
max attempt. Let’s say that you can
squat around 315 for your max. On this
day, your sets might look like this: 135 for 5, 155 for 5, 185 for 5, 205 for
5, 225 for 3, 245 for 3, 260 for 3, 275 for 1, 295 for 1, 305 for 1, and,
finally, 315 for 1 rep. The key on this
day is to take your time working up to the final single. You don’t want to make larger jumps and end
up using too few sets. And, by the way,
the stronger you are, the more sets you should do, anyway. If you, for instance, are a really strong
squatter who can do 495 for 1 rep, then you should do upwards of 15 to 20 sets
before you reach that max (or near max) attempt. When you finish with the squat, you would do
the same thing for your deadlift. On the
bench press, just (duh) bench press for ramps.
On the speed day,
stick with the format used by Westside.
No need to re-invent the wheel.
For the squats, use 10 to 12 sets of doubles at 50-60% of your one-rep
max. For the deadlifts, 10 to 12 doubles
(or just singles) using around 50% of your max.
And, for the bench press, 10 sets of 3 using 60-65% of your one-rep max. If you have access to them, bands and chains
may be utilized as well.
On the high-set,
low-rep day, do 8 to 10 sets of 1-3 reps using approximately 85% of your max. Do doubles for the squats, triples for the
bench press, and singles on the deadlifts.
Make sure you do a few warm-up sets before beginning your work sets.
Finally, do
assistance work as needed/wanted on any of the training days. On the squat/deadlift days, good assistance movements
would be weighted sit-ups or the ab wheel for your stomach (you must
have a strong core to squat and deadlift truly heavy weights), varieties of good
mornings for your lower back and hamstrings, power cleans or power snatches to
aid your pulling strength, and box squats or front squats for more squatting power. Don’t overdo the assistance movements—pick 2
or 3 lifts once you are finished with the squatting and deadlifting and do them
for 1 to 2 sets of 6-8 reps each, with no assistance sets even
approaching failure.
For your bench
press, focus on exercises for the triceps, front delts, and lats. Skull crushers, pushdowns, or JM presses are
good triceps selections. Chins or lat
pulldowns are good lat choices. Front plate
raises, military presses, or lying barbell raises are all good front delt movements. Once again, pick just 2 or 3 lifts for each
day and work them for 1-2 sets of 6-8 reps.
Your program
template should look like this:
Week One
Monday: SQ/DL Ramps
Tuesday: off
Wednesday: off
Thursday: BP Ramps
Friday: off
Saturday: off
Sunday: SQ/DL Speed
Week Two
Monday: off
Tuesday: off
Wednesday: BP Speed
Thursday: off
Friday: off
Saturday: SQ/DL high-set, low-rep HEAVY
Sunday: off
Week Three
Monday: off
Tuesday: BP high-set, low-rep HEAVY
Wednesday: off
Thursday: off
Friday: SQ/DL Ramps
Saturday: off
Sunday: off
Week Four
Monday: BP Ramps
Tuesday: off
Wednesday: off
Thursday: SQ/DL Speed
Friday: off
Saturday: off
Sunday: BP speed
And so on and so
forth. Notice that you have around 2 and
½ weeks between doing the same workout for the same lift(s).
The key to making
this work is to make sure that you get in all of your sets on each training
day. If you make bigger jumps—and, thus,
less sets—on your ramp days or cut down on your sets on the other days, it won’t
work. Since the training frequency is low,
the volume must be high.
Even though I
have used a powerlifting template as an example, this would work well for any
number of lifts. You can also use
something like this if you’re a bench press specialist. Simply cut out the SQ/DL days altogether and
take off 4 days between each session.
Sometimes,
programs such as this one are a good break even if you do prefer a HFT program
or use a more “common” bodybuilding-style routine. If that’s you, then consider using this
program for a few weeks just to give your body, and your mind, some needed rest.
Low-frequency
training might not be my favorite method of training but that doesn’t mean it’s
not effective. If you’re after more
strength—with a lean, dense physique as a possible side effect—give this
program a go. You may surprise yourself
with just how strong you get.
If you enjoyed
this essay, would like to read similar ones, and would like to support my
writing, then please consider purchasing my most recent e-book, “Ultimate Mass
& Power Essays.”
Comments
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave us some feedback on the article or any topics you would like us to cover in the future! Much Appreciated!