Skip to main content

Forgotten Secrets of Muscle Building

 Hypertrophy Training that WORKS for the Natural Lifter



     In my recent essay “The Game Changers,” I wrote this about high-frequency training: “Although it (HFT) is more mainstream now, I suppose, it’s still the kind of lesser-known of training methods, at least among the general population.  And even among lifters who do know about it, it’s still often dismissed because it’s not how competitive bodybuilders train.  It’s also certainly not how pro bodybuilders—i.e. drug users—train.  But that’s the thing.  It’s dismissed because it’s not attempted by enough drug-free bodybuilders.  Something tells me that if anabolic steroids never existed, it might be the #1 method of lifting among everyone—powerlifters, Olympic lifters, and bodybuilders.”  For some reason today, I thought about that sentence—there are always thoughts about my training and writing swirling around in my head; it can be a bit annoying—and then it made me think about other forgotten methods of training that might benefit today’s drug-free, natural lifters.  What follows are the often forgotten methods of training that would greatly benefit you if you're after the maximum amount of hypertrophy without resorting to a needle.

     In many ways, I guess, this could have also been titled Game Changers 2, as these secrets could very well change-the-game in your mass-building quest.  And as I wrote with high-frequency training above—which will be the first one we’ll discuss below—I think these are the very things that most bodybuilders would have stuck with, and gravitated toward, if steroids had never come into the world.


Frequent Training

     High-frequency training wasn’t just a game changer for me—and all of my lifters—when I first discovered, and then implemented, it; it was a method of training that should have never had to be rediscovered in the first place.  In many ways, when discussing old-school methods of training, this was the one method that all bodybuilders used 100 years ago.  It was used consistently all the way from then until the ‘80s, when bodybuilders started resting their bodyparts more between workout sessions.  But if you look at all bodybuilders in the ‘70s and before, no matter what exactly their training looked like—whether they used only a few exercises or tons of exercises; whether they used a lot of sets or a few sets; whether they trained with high reps or low reps—all of them trained frequently.

     In the ‘90s—with the advent of increasingly more anabolic steroid use among competitive bodybuilders—lifters started training their lifts/bodyparts less frequently.  Guys like Dorian Yates reduced the length of their workouts and the frequency of their workouts… and became absolutely massive.  But that’s the issue with steroids that’s never discussed.  Steroids don’t just allow you to train less frequently, they make that (perhaps) the best form of training that you can do.  When natural bodybuilders follow a split where they train one-bodypart-per-day and train each bodypart only once-per-week, they (often) end up both overtraining and undertraining.  They do too much at each workout session since they’re training infrequently (not a problem on steroids) and then, because they are so sore from such workouts, they wait too long before the next session (also not a problem for the steroid user).  Steroids, because they keep you in an “anabolic state” constantly, actually make that sort of training almost ideal.  Of course, that’s not to say that a bodybuilder on steroids can’t also train frequently since the exogenous testosterone also enhances recovery so damn much, but it’s not necessary to train that way on drugs.  (While I’m mentioning steroids, let me say that another benefit is the fact that you also don’t have to do any of the other things we’re going to discuss below; you don’t need to take advantage of other methods that enhance muscle growth because you’re already “enhanced” enough, which makes, once again, infrequent, one-bodypart-per-workout training the “best.”)

     All of this is not to say that the natural bodybuilder should start training as frequently as he or she possibly can.  Adding more volume and more frequency to your already existing workout program is not the answer.  But you do want to slowly increase the amount of work you do until you build up the capacity to train not just frequently but also with enough poundage and volume.  All of which brings us to our next secret.


Full-Body Workouts or Two-Way Split Training

     For the first 50 years or so of bodybuilding’s history, no one used split workouts.  Those weren’t used by lifters until the ‘40s, when some of the top muscle-men experimented with them.  But even then, full-body workouts were used by the majority of bodybuilders, and, yep, even the top ones, well until the ‘60s, when split workouts became more prominent.  But even then, no one used more than a two-way split.  And when two-way splits became the norm, they were often what I refer to as “full-body split workouts.”  A bodybuilder might train legs, chest, and shoulders one day—with plenty of barbell work; squats, bench presses, and overhead presses, and their variations—and then heavy back and arms on another day.  Back wasn’t just lat pulldowns or chins, either.  It was deadlifts, power cleans, snatches, rows, and other, similar, movements.  So a bodybuilder often utilized his back, leg, and hip muscles—the muscles that promote the most growth when trained—as much as 6-days-per-week.     

     Nowadays, when a natural bodybuilder begins training, he or she often starts with multi-bodypart splits.  But most find they don’t see progress—unless they’re simply built for that kind of training; those are the modern bodybuilders that are typically the most successful—until they go to full-body workouts utilizing heavy barbell and dumbbell movements; the classical lifts.  Which brings us around to our next forgotten secret.


Whole Body Lifts

     Whole body lifts were, in many ways, the baby that got thrown out with the bathwater when it comes to split training.  It was understood that whole body lifts could promote strength and growth, but as bodybuilders started training more-and-more with bodypart-specific splits, they got away from doing exercises that targeted the entire body.  After all, where are you going to put the clean-and-jerk in your training rotation when it works the back, the leg muscles, the shoulder, and the “core” in equal fashion?  The answer, of course, is not anywhere.

     Whole body lifts have at least made something of a comeback due to the popularity of Crossfit and other “functional” training methods, but they still aren’t used enough by bodybuilders and regular gym-goers that just want to look good.  But if you want more muscle mass—these exercises are mistakenly seen more as strength-builders than mass-builders, which is more than a little foolish—you need to include some whole body lifts into your routine.  Just remember: the more muscles that are worked in an exercise, the better!  All kinds of clean and presses are fantastic—barbell, dumbbell, kettlebell; one arm and two arm.  Same goes for the variety of snatches.  Any exercise that combines two movements into one are virtually fool-proof bets for more muscle growth.  The squat and press is a good example, as is the clean and curl.  Ditto for any “complexes” where you do a series of exercises back-to-back without setting down the barbell, dumbbell, or kettlebell.

     Recently, I was in my home state of Texas for a week for a family reunion.  I stayed in a rural county at an Airbnb, and didn’t want to drive 30 miles to the nearest gym, so all I took with me for training was a pair of 20kg kettlebells.  And the only exercise I did with the kettlebells was Dan John’s “armor-building” complex, which consists of the double kettlebell clean, the double kettlebell overhead press, and the double kettlebell front squat.  I can’t remember the exact reps that John recommended, but I did my sets with a 5/3/8 rep range.  5 reps of cleans, followed immediately with 3 presses, then the 8 squats.  I did however many sets I felt like on each day, and trained every day while there.  And at the end of the trip, I realized that you would need little other than that one complex to build a good degree of muscle and strength if you trained it daily.  Because whole-body lifts plus high-frequency equals big-time results.


Train Long, Not Hard, with Moderate and “Reasonable” Workouts

     I have written a few times that “moderation sucks” or that your body needs challenges on occasion in order to continue to progress.  Without challenges, the body can grow complacent if not careful.  But you shouldn’t treat each-and-every workout session like an all-out military assault on your muscle tissue.  Old-time bodybuilders certainly didn’t.  Sure, you need to occasionally test your boundaries and limits, and you should also occasionally follow a program that pushes you almost to the edge, but those are the exceptions, not the rule.

     About a decade ago, maybe longer, when I was writing regularly for Planet Muscle, I received a call one night from Jeff Everson.  If you don’t know Everson, who died in 2019, he was a famous bodybuilder who was the one-time husband of multiple Ms. Olympia winner Cory Everson, and the former editor of Muscle & Fitness during its heyday.  He was also a heck of a guy who I miss talking training with.  Anyway, that evening he called me to discuss an article I had written.  I can’t even remember exactly which one, but he thought some of the material I had written about the training of old-time bodybuilders, from the ‘70s and before, was a little mistaken.  He said that, having personally watched a lot of the bodybuilders from the ‘70s train, they didn’t exactly train the way it was written in the magazines.  He said that, sure, they trained each bodypart 3x weekly, and, sure, they trained with a lot of sets.  But he said they only had one really hard workout each week, and that was the workout that would be printed in the magazines.  He said the other workouts for that same bodypart during the week would be medium or even light workouts.  He also suggested that was the key to the full-body workouts from earlier eras.  None of their full-body sessions were “intense,” but they were simply moderate workouts, doing only enough to allow them to train with the same level of intensity at each session.  Over the years, they would slowly increase the amount of total work, and weight, being utilized.  Keep that advice in mind if you ever try something such as Arnold’s “Golden 6” workout plan.


More Sets, Less Reps

     Almost all training programs nowadays for hypertrophy involve doing less sets and more reps.  The standard 3 sets of 10 reps is the most common example, but all set/rep ranges seem to revolve around something similar.  But as Pavel writes, “if you get a pump with heavy weights, you’ll get big.”  8 sets of 5 reps is a good standard.  That’s also much closer to the kind of training that old-time bodybuilders did in the ‘40s and earlier.

     5 sets of 5 reps is a good starting point, probably, for the average gym-goer when beginning this sort of training.  As you progress, start doing more and more sets, but keep your reps around 5, and go even lower on occasion.

     I have written at length about this sort of training on the blog, so I won’t go into too much detail here, but if you’re interested in seeing what some programs might look like, here are two good ones to start with:

The 10x5 Method

The 3x10x3 Method


To Sum it Up

     Even though most of these “secrets” have been forgotten by the training and lifting masses, many of the training programs I write on this blog use them.  So if you’re looking for even more programs, please search through the site.  These methods may be forgotten by most, but you can use them to break away from the hypertrophy herd and build mass that stands out from the rest of the crowd.




     


Comments

  1. Hey CS, do you think there is any way to work the whole body most days, like up to 6? At 50, im trying to get as lean as possible while maintaining as much strength as possible. I do not have much in the way of weights, the heaviest thing i have is a 72 pound kettlebell. I have a 52 pound adjustable dumbbell set, numerous standard weights just not heavy ones and a pullup, dip tower. At my job, I have a semi good set up weight room. Lately I have been doing one set, full body, to failure (piston like reps, not 100% range of motion) one exercise per bodypart, about 10 exercises, pretty much every day, until I feel like either life gets in the way or I just need a day off. I actually enjoy it and feel a little sore and a little pumped every day. I got the idea from Phil Hernon. I'm just worried I'm either not doing enough or every day is too much. I'd love to know your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I do think you can train that way. In fact, it MIGHT be the best form of training that you can do, especially with minimal equipment. I think the key to high-frequency training for high-volume (lots reps) is learning what is enough for your body, and what is too much. The reason I don't typically recommend that kind of training to the average trainee is because of how difficult it is to program, but I think you have a good idea there to do around 10 exercises for 1 set each. It's similar in a way to a program Gironda recommended to get celebrities into shape fast, where he had them do a full-body workout of around 10 exercises for 1 set. They would add sets to each exercise at the end of a training week. If you're going to complete failure, that COULD be too much, however, with the kind of frequency you're doing, but if you are getting stronger each week, stick with it. One idea could be to pick a total number of reps that you plan on doing each day. It might be 100 reps, or 200 if you're using light movements. Whatever it is, just tell yourself you'll get that number. It could be 10 exercises for 10 reps each, or 5 exercises for 20 reps each; that sort of thing. Do that for a week or two, and then add volume each week for a few weeks before taking a de-load week after that. Something of that nature would be good. And if you're going to train 6 days a week, even if you're getting results at the moment, I would have an "active recovery" week about once every 4 to 6 weeks depending on recovery ability. But, overall, I think your training plan looks relatively sound.

      I hope I answered your question, but if you have a follow-up, ask away. Good luck with the training!

      Delete
    2. CS, thank you for your reply! I have actually toned the number of reps way down and my joints seem to be responding better. I do not go to complete failure! The reps are piston like, 80% or so ROM. Once I slow down the pace or pause to catch my breath, the set is concluded. A full body workout can take 15 minutes to complete. I'm not spent, but feel pumped and I can get back after it the next day. Most of the exercises I use are bodyweight. One leg squats, pullups, dips, close grip pushups, but I will do rdls and curls. My goal is not size, but fat loss. My body type is short, stocky and I put on muscle and fat relatively easy, I guess I would be considered an endo-mesomorph. So frequency never really bothers me. Thank you for all you do CS!

      Delete
    3. My pleasure. Thank you for reading my articles.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Feel free to leave us some feedback on the article or any topics you would like us to cover in the future! Much Appreciated!

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Bodybuilding: The Natural Power-Bodybuilding Methods of Chuck Sipes

Chuck Sipes as he appeared in the pages of the original Ironman Magazine. For a while now, I have wanted to write a piece on one of my favorite bodybuilders of all time: Chuck Sipes. I had relented in doing so until now only because there are so many good pieces that you can find on the internet just from doing a cursory search. But I finally figured, you know, what the hell, you can never have too much Chuck Sipes. Also, in addition to my own memories and thoughts on Sipes' totally bad-a training, I've tried to find some of the best information from various sites, and include a lot of that here. For those of you that don't know much about Sipes, he was one of a kind. I know that's a bit cliché, and I've used such terms before when it comes to other "classic bodybuilders", but there was nothing cliché about Sipes, so it's completely true in this instance. Don't believe me? Then read on. First off, he was natural. In fact, he was one of the l

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Don Howorth's Formula for Wide, Massive Shoulders Vintage picture of Don Howorth in competition shape. I can't remember the first time I laid eyes on Howorth's massive physique with those absolutely friggin' awesomely shaped "cannonball" shoulders of his, but it was probably sometime in the late '80s and early '90s, when I read about him in either IronMan Magazine  or MuscleMag International .  IronMan  had regular "Mass from the Past" articles written by Gene Mozee that had a couple of articles about Howorth's training*, and he was also mentioned fairly regularly in Vince Gironda's column for MuscleMag  not to mention in some of the articles of Greg Zulak for the same publication. There is no doubt that genetics played a big role in just how fantastic Howorth's delts looked, but to claim Howorth's results were just because of genetics or anabolic steroids - as I've read claimed on some internet forums - is a l

The 8x5/6 Program

Slow and Steady Wins the Hypertrophy Race An “Easy” One-Exercise-Per-Bodypart Muscle-Building Program      Part of effective programming—whether you’re trying to build muscle, gain strength, or a combination of both—is learning how to balance volume, frequency, and intensity.  I often write that you must have two of the factors high —or one high and the other moderate—and the remaining factor must be low.  If you’re going to train with a lot of volume and intensity, then your frequency must be low (the standard method of training these days).  If you’re going to train using a high-frequency program—of which I am admittedly and unabashedly a fan—then you need to keep either your volume or your intensity low.  And so on and so forth.  But you can also do a program where all of the factors are moderate .  The program I want to present here takes this latter approach.      I have actually wanted to write about this program before, but I’ve been a little hesitant to do so because it seems s