Skip to main content

The 10x5 Method

 The 10x5 Method:

10 Sets of 5 Reps for Massive Growth AND Strength & Power


"If you get a pump while training with heavy weights, you will get big."*  -Pavel Tsatsouline

The great Pat Casey was a firm believer in exactly the kind of training discussed here.


The above quote by Russian strength training guru Pavel Tsatsouline sums up what is often called the energetic theory of muscle growth.  This theory, in more detail than the aforementioned quote, means that - in order to grow a sufficient amount of muscle mass AND strength - you need to have both fatigue and tension present in your training regimen.  But therein lies the problem.  Fatigue best happens through a high volume of training - multiple sets of high reps, or very few sets of high repetition training taken to total momentary muscular failure are great ways to develop fatigue, and also an ideal way for some lifters to build plenty of muscle.  But it sucks at building absolute strength.  The converse is true, as well - A high amount of tension is necessary if one wants to be capable of moving massive weights, regardless of one's size.  So this means that, if you want to get butt-kickingly strong, you are best served by training like a powerlifter.  Perform triples, doubles, and singles with near maximum weight, take plenty of rest in between sets to minimize fatigue (and therefore minimize the "pump"), and you have yourself a sure-fire method for getting as strong and powerful as you can.  But NOT big.


So what are you to do if you want a large combination of both strength and power plus the muscle size to go with it?  One of the answers (and, yes, there are other ways to skin this muscle-building, strength-generating cat, but we will save those musings for another post) is with the 10x5 method, or something similar that involves heavy weight, high-set, low-rep methodology.  For the sake of keeping this post relatively short, we will stick with the 10x5 method, but 10x3, 10x2, 15x1, 20x1, or other such similar methods can be employed, but, no matter what the exact set/rep range, they all amount to the same thing: doing a lot of sets with heavy weights and very few reps.  But I believe that the best version of high-set, low-rep training is probably the 10x5 method.  (It's kind of the "Goldilocks" of high-set, low-rep training in that it's just right between not being too much of a workload or too little.)


The "Basic" 10x5 Program

The workout program below is a perfect example of the sort of training you should do.  Perform this workout for 6 to 8 weeks before changing to something different.


For each bodypart, rotate between the three exercises listed.  Perform each exercise for 2 to 3 workouts before changing to another of the three exercises.  As far as the amount of weight used, pick a weight that you can do for 7 or 8 reps before reaching failure.  If 5 reps starts to become difficult after several sets, then reduce weight by a 10 to 20 pounds, and continue until all 10 sets are finished.


All sets listed are "work" sets, which means that you will need a warm-up before beginning the "official" part of the workout session.  My recommendation - although some individuals will need less and some will need more - is to perform "ramps" working up to your work sets.  Take squats, for instance, if you're going to, say, squat 225 for 10 sets of 5 reps (or start your work sets with that weight), then perform a set of 5 with just the barbell, followed by a set of 5 with 135, then a set of 5 with 175, followed by a set weight 200, and then perform your work sets with 225.  The beauty of this method is that it also helps to increase your workload (another important factor when it comes to building muscle mass and strength) without generating much fatigue.  However, there are some lifters that employ less warm-ups, especially younger trainees.  And, conversely of course, there are some older lifters that will need a couple more sets to feel as if their muscles are sufficiently warmed up before beginning their more strenuous work sets.  But I think my recommendation is sound as a good starting point for all power-building lifters.

Day One: Chest and Back

Incline Dumbbell Bench Presses, Incline Flat Bench Presses, or Flat Dumbbell Bench Presses: 10 sets of 5 reps

Lat Pulldowns, One-Arm Dumbbell Rows, or Power Cleans: 10 sets of 5 reps

Day Two: Shoulders and Arms

Behind-the-Neck Barbell Presses, Seated Dumbbell Presses, or One-Arm Dumbbell Overhead Presses: 10 sets of 5 reps

Barbell Curls, Standing Alternate Dumbbell Curls, or Cable Curls: 10 sets of 5 reps

Lying Barbell Triceps Extensions (Skull Crushers),  Triceps Pushdowns, or Weighted Dips: 10 sets of 5 reps

Day Three: Off

Day Four: Legs

Squats, Front Squats, or Dumbbell Squats: 10 sets of 5 reps

Romanian Deadlifts, Standing One-Leg Curls, or Lying Leg Curls: 10 sets of 5 reps

Machine Calf Raises, One-Leg Weighted Calf Raises, or Donkey Calf Raises: 10 sets of 5 reps

Day Five: Off

Day Six: Repeat

NOTE: On all "one-limb" movements such as alternate dumbbell curls, one-leg calf raises, etc., make sure that you perform 5 reps for each arm or leg.


Keep in mind that this program, as with all of my written programs, are just examples.  For instance, if there are other exercises that work well for you as opposed to the ones I have listed, then, by all means, use them.  Also, even though I think 10x5 is is ideal for almost ALL lifters, there are some lifters who WILL get better results from 7 or 8 sets of 5, instead of 10.  These are often "hardgainers" who respond better to less, no matter the program being used.  But the inverse is also true (and here's where a lot of coaches and personal trainers get it wrong), because there are also - what strength coach Bill Starr called - the "other kind of hard-gainers" who actually respond well to more work NOT less.  If this is you, then a 12 to 15 sets of 5 reps program might be better.  On this final note, never forget that lifting is an art, and it's not just an art of learning about weights, form, technique, methodologies, etc. but it's an art of learning one's own body, and that will always take a little bit of experimentation.




*from Pavel's book "Beyond Bodybuilding: Muscle and Strength Training Secrets for the Renaissance Man"

Comments

  1. how long to rest between sets ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is the one question I get asked more than any on this blog because I NEVER recommend rest periods, and, in fact, I'm opposed to programs that DO recommend them. The reason is because of individual response to rest. Basically, if you're trying to ONLY gain muscle, then you need to perform your next set before your oxygen debt has recovered. For this program, you want your oxygen deficit to be fully recovered. This PROBABLY means anywhere from 90 seconds to 3 minutes between sets (on average),

      Delete
    2. thank you for the answer

      Delete

Post a Comment

Feel free to leave us some feedback on the article or any topics you would like us to cover in the future! Much Appreciated!

Popular posts from this blog

Marvin Eder’s Mass-Building Methods

  The Many and Varied Mass-Building Methods of Power Bodybuilding’s G.O.A.T. Eder as he appeared in my article "Full Body Workouts" for IronMan  magazine.      In many ways, the essay you are now reading is the one that has had the “longest time coming.”  I have no clue why it has taken me this long to write an article specifically on Marvin Eder, especially considering the fact that I have long considered him the greatest bodybuilder cum strength athlete of all friggin’ time .  In fact, over 20 years ago, I wrote this in the pages of IronMan magazine: In my opinion, the greatest all-around bodybuilder, powerlifter and strength athlete ever to walk the planet, Eder had 19-inch arms at a bodyweight of 198. He could bench 510, squat 550 for 10 reps and do a barbell press with 365. He was reported to have achieved the amazing feat of cranking out 1,000 dips in only 17 minutes. Imagine doing a dip a second for 17 minutes. As Gene Mozee once put it, “Modern bodybuilders couldn’t

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Don Howorth's Formula for Wide, Massive Shoulders Vintage picture of Don Howorth in competition shape. I can't remember the first time I laid eyes on Howorth's massive physique with those absolutely friggin' awesomely shaped "cannonball" shoulders of his, but it was probably sometime in the late '80s and early '90s, when I read about him in either IronMan Magazine  or MuscleMag International .  IronMan  had regular "Mass from the Past" articles written by Gene Mozee that had a couple of articles about Howorth's training*, and he was also mentioned fairly regularly in Vince Gironda's column for MuscleMag  not to mention in some of the articles of Greg Zulak for the same publication. There is no doubt that genetics played a big role in just how fantastic Howorth's delts looked, but to claim Howorth's results were just because of genetics or anabolic steroids - as I've read claimed on some internet forums - is a l

Classic Bodybuilding: The Natural Power-Bodybuilding Methods of Chuck Sipes

Chuck Sipes as he appeared in the pages of the original Ironman Magazine. For a while now, I have wanted to write a piece on one of my favorite bodybuilders of all time: Chuck Sipes. I had relented in doing so until now only because there are so many good pieces that you can find on the internet just from doing a cursory search. But I finally figured, you know, what the hell, you can never have too much Chuck Sipes. Also, in addition to my own memories and thoughts on Sipes' totally bad-a training, I've tried to find some of the best information from various sites, and include a lot of that here. For those of you that don't know much about Sipes, he was one of a kind. I know that's a bit cliché, and I've used such terms before when it comes to other "classic bodybuilders", but there was nothing cliché about Sipes, so it's completely true in this instance. Don't believe me? Then read on. First off, he was natural. In fact, he was one of the l