Skip to main content

THE 3X10X3 METHOD

 Build the Ultimate Combination of Mass and Strength with this Unique High-Set, Low-rep Method of Training

The late, great Anthony Ditillo utilized programs very similar to what is written here.  If he were with us today, he'd probably give this one a thumbs up and say, "Ditillo approved!"


Some of my favorite programs for building muscle mass involve the use of high-sets and low-reps.  In fact, when I first started this blog 14 years ago, one of the very FIRST questions I was asked by a reader was whether or not I had a “favorite” method of training.  At first, I think I was going to “cop out” and tell him some crap such as, “the best workout is the one you’re not doing” kind of thing.  But then I decided that, hell, honesty is always the best policy, and so I told him the truth: my FAVORITE approach to training was the high-set, low-rep method, specifically using anywhere between 10 to 20 sets of 1 to 5 reps.


Fourteen years later is that still the case?  Yes, and no.  I think it is one of the TWO best ways to train.   My other favorite method—and if this ain’t your first rodeo here at Integral Strength you know exactly where I’m going with this—is high-frequency training (HFT for short).  Add in the fact, too, that I’m now in my 5th decade of existence on our lovely planet Earth, and I also do a lot of higher-repetition training (just read my Ageless Bodybuilding articles if you’re as old, or older than me).  But using a high-set, low-rep method of training is STILL one of the best ways for bodybuilders to build a lot of muscle mass and strength, especially young male bodybuilders.  (As I’ve written elsewhere, I like slightly higher repetitions for the female athlete.  In the future, I will write something specifically for the female bodybuilder, but for now, if you’re female and want to try a program such as this one, here’s my advice: do slightly less sets and slightly more repetitions.  In fact, if this was written specifically for the female bodybuilder, it would be called the 3x7x6 method—don’t worry, it’ll all make sense shortly if you’re currently confused as hell.)


The 3x10x3 Method involves performing 3 exercises for 10 sets of 3 reps on each exercise.  The beauty of it, for me, is that it allows for enough flexibility no matter the exact split, or full-body workout, that you are using.


If you have never done such a form of training before, then start off with what I call a full-body split program.  At each session, pick 3 exercises that work pretty much your entire body.  At the next session, pick a different set of 3 exercises that also work your entire body, but work them through different planes of motion.


As an example, train 3 days-per-week.  For the first workout, do the following exercises:

Squats

Chins

Overhead presses


At the 2nd workout, do the following:

Deadlifts

Flat bench presses

Barbell curls


Both of those workouts are full-body, but both of them also work your muscles in entirely different planes of movement.  On the 3rd workout of the week, repeat the first workout or if you are advanced, and therefore need more variation, do a workout such as this one:

Front squats

Power cleans

One-arm overhead dumbbell presses


And, as mentioned, every single exercise should be performed for 10 sets of 3 reps.  To determine the weight that you should utilize, here is my general rule: Anytime that you are going to do 10 sets of a single exercise, pick a weight where you could get double the repetitions if you were attempting one single all-out set.  So if you were doing a 10 sets of 10 reps program, you would pick a weight where you could get about 20 reps.  10 sets of 5 would be performed with a weight where you could get 10 reps for one all-out set.  Which means that, here, pick a weight where you would reach failure on about the 6th repetition.


One of the beauties of this program is that it works no matter your preferred body part split.  If you are going to train with an upper/lower split, training your entire upper body on one day, and your lower body on the next, then your program might look something such as this:

Workout One:

Squats

Stiff-legged deadlifts

Front squats


Workout Two:

Incline bench presses

Wide-grip chins

Barbell overhead presses


Substitute the chins with some barbell curls on occasion, and that’s a pretty damn good program that would be hard to beat for a combination of power, strength, and muscle mass.


If you’re “old-school” and still like to train the way we did back in the 1980s with something like a 3-on/1-off split, then here are a couple of options:


The Push/Pull Routine:

Day One:

Flat dumbbell bench presses

Barbell overhead presses

Weighted dips


Day Two:

Front Squats

Barbell hack squats

Stiff-legged Deadlifts


Day Three:

Power cleans

Wide-grip chins

Barbell curls


The Antagonistic Routine:

Day One:

Barbell bench presses

Bent-over rows

Behind-the-neck presses


Day Two:

Barbell squats

Romanian deadlifts

Seated calf raises


Day Three:

Barbell curls

Lying pullover-and-presses

Standing wrist curls



If you’re wondering, yes, you can eventually add exercises so that you are doing a 4x10x3 or even a 5x10x3, but do NOT rush into such training until you’ve built up the work capacity.  Spend 12 to 16 weeks doing some of the variations listed here first.


Good luck and good training!  And if you have any questions, please feel free to email me or write in the comments below.


Comments

  1. Good stuff. Low rep, high sets training is great. I usually pick one excercise each day, decide on the weight to be used, and commence doing sets in the 1-5 rep range until I can no longer complete singles in good form. Rest periods are kept short.

    you rack up quite a bit of Volume in a short time, and using only one excercise allows you to really focus on the task at hand.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Feel free to leave us some feedback on the article or any topics you would like us to cover in the future! Much Appreciated!

Popular posts from this blog

Marvin Eder’s Mass-Building Methods

  The Many and Varied Mass-Building Methods of Power Bodybuilding’s G.O.A.T. Eder as he appeared in my article "Full Body Workouts" for IronMan  magazine.      In many ways, the essay you are now reading is the one that has had the “longest time coming.”  I have no clue why it has taken me this long to write an article specifically on Marvin Eder, especially considering the fact that I have long considered him the greatest bodybuilder cum strength athlete of all friggin’ time .  In fact, over 20 years ago, I wrote this in the pages of IronMan magazine: In my opinion, the greatest all-around bodybuilder, powerlifter and strength athlete ever to walk the planet, Eder had 19-inch arms at a bodyweight of 198. He could bench 510, squat 550 for 10 reps and do a barbell press with 365. He was reported to have achieved the amazing feat of cranking out 1,000 dips in only 17 minutes. Imagine doing a dip a second for 17 minutes. As Gene Mozee once put it, “Modern bodybuilders couldn’t

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Don Howorth's Formula for Wide, Massive Shoulders Vintage picture of Don Howorth in competition shape. I can't remember the first time I laid eyes on Howorth's massive physique with those absolutely friggin' awesomely shaped "cannonball" shoulders of his, but it was probably sometime in the late '80s and early '90s, when I read about him in either IronMan Magazine  or MuscleMag International .  IronMan  had regular "Mass from the Past" articles written by Gene Mozee that had a couple of articles about Howorth's training*, and he was also mentioned fairly regularly in Vince Gironda's column for MuscleMag  not to mention in some of the articles of Greg Zulak for the same publication. There is no doubt that genetics played a big role in just how fantastic Howorth's delts looked, but to claim Howorth's results were just because of genetics or anabolic steroids - as I've read claimed on some internet forums - is a l

Classic Bodybuilding: The Natural Power-Bodybuilding Methods of Chuck Sipes

Chuck Sipes as he appeared in the pages of the original Ironman Magazine. For a while now, I have wanted to write a piece on one of my favorite bodybuilders of all time: Chuck Sipes. I had relented in doing so until now only because there are so many good pieces that you can find on the internet just from doing a cursory search. But I finally figured, you know, what the hell, you can never have too much Chuck Sipes. Also, in addition to my own memories and thoughts on Sipes' totally bad-a training, I've tried to find some of the best information from various sites, and include a lot of that here. For those of you that don't know much about Sipes, he was one of a kind. I know that's a bit cliché, and I've used such terms before when it comes to other "classic bodybuilders", but there was nothing cliché about Sipes, so it's completely true in this instance. Don't believe me? Then read on. First off, he was natural. In fact, he was one of the l