Skip to main content

The Way of the Modern Ronin, Part 6

Essays and Thoughts on The Dokkodo
Part 6
Be Detached from Desire Your Entire Life

Statue of Musashi and Kojiro in battle. (public domain)


This passage seems a little odd when first we read it.  It's odd because, well, didn't Musashi desire to be a good samurai?  Isn't it desire that pushed Musashi to want to be a great swordsman in the first place?

But this saying isn't quite what it seems.  Roshi Richard Collins, author of No Fear Zen, has this to say: "The word for desire here, yokushin, suggests specifically selfish wishes, lusts, or cupidity, that greediness for physical pleasure or material accumulation that resists control."  In other words, you are to be detached from those things which prevent you from practicing budo.  Your desire should be for attaining deeper and broader martial skills, not money or fame or to even be a fighter (as opposed to a martial artist).  Of course, just because one calls himself a martial artist doesn't mean that he is one.  The number of charlatan "grandmasters" or "keyboard warriors" who have never practiced true martial arts - but write as if they have - should attest to this.

Please don't think that being "detached from yokushin" means that you shouldn't strive for perfection in your martial art, or in your lifting weights, or, well, anything that you love to do that can be a way.  By "way" here, I mean it in the sense that is used in bushido, or the "way of the warrior".  Here, way - or do - is a path that the practitioner follows.  Following it is what makes her a practitioner.  In traditional Japanese culture, you have the way of tea, the way of the bow, the way of flower arrangement, the way of writing - the list of both traditional, and perhaps non-traditional, dos is rather lengthy.  This is one of the reasons that, on my blog, I often treat lifting weights - and other forms of resistance training - as a way, because it is one!

Another point that needs to be made here is in regards to detachment.  A better word might be "non-attachment", so that this entire musing could, possibly, best be translated as: "Non-attachment to yokushin should be practiced one's entire life."  On this point, Roshi Richard Collins adds this, "In Buddhist thought 'non-attachment' is not the same as 'detachment.'  Being detached implies an attitude of indifference, and certainly Musashi would have his samurai indifferent to the tugs of desire.  But non-attachment implies a more thorough and paradoxical immunity to desire, one that would allow participation in a desire with a simultaneous uninvolvement.  There is a kind of desire that implies no sense of attachment, only a healthy striving, as in having a 'desire for world peace.'  A 'lust' or 'obsession' for world peace, however, we would agree sounds harmful.  These are forms of attachment to a specific goal, the frustrations of which can be dangerous, and this is what yokushin implies."

Non-attachment (at least, in the minds of budoka) is, therefore, an aid to action.  For instance, this sort of thinking had been in martial arts long before Musashi, or even long before the Japanese forms of do.  I have in mind the Taoist notion of "wu-wei", which is literally translated as "no action", but in practice means something more akin to "effortless action" or "spontaneous action".  Perhaps even the "action of non-attachment" might be a good definition.

When you practice the "action of non-attachment" you are also moving close to the budo concept of mushin.  Emptying your mind, and acting with wu-wei, leads to what is often described as a flow state.  The legendary Zen master Takuan Soho wrote in his book The Unfettered Mind: "The mind must always be in the state of 'flowing,' for when it stops anywhere that means the flow is interrupted and it is this interruption that is injurious to the well-being of the mind. In the case of the
swordsman, it means death. When the swordsman stands against his opponent, he is not to think of the
opponent, nor of himself, nor of his enemy's sword movements. He just stands there with his sword
which, forgetful of all technique, is ready only to follow the dictates of the subconscious. The man has effaced himself as the wielder of the sword. When he strikes, it is not the man but the sword in the hand of the man's subconscious that strikes."  If you are sparring in the gym, and you desire to strike your opponent with a particular move then that particular move won't work!  However, if one relaxes, and has a mind of mushin that is ready to act with non-attachment, it is then that one can achieve the goal of striking one's opponent.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Mass & Power Resurrection!

Build Massive Muscles and Monstrous Strength with Heavy, Old-School Dumbbell Training      I don’t know when it happened, or how it happened, but when it comes to strength and power training, we think of barbells and little else.  I’m guilty of this myself.  I’ve written before about using the “ two barbell workout .”  It’s a sound theory, don’t get me wrong.  Basically, if you start your workout session, any workout session, with 2 big, compound barbell lifts—say, front squats and power cleans—you can then do whatever else you want for the rest of the workout and you will get great results.  Or, heck, you can just do 2 compound barbell lifts and nothing else at each workout.  But there was a time not that long ago, when the largest, most massive, muscular, and strongest lifters on the planet—the so-called “Bronze era” of the late 19th century, early 20th century—when strongmen did most of their training with dumbbells and not b...

The Hardgainer Size Solution

A 10-Week Mass Building Regimen for Lifters Struggling to Pack on Size      I don’t like the term “hardgainer.”  I don’t mean to imply that some lifters don’t find it harder to pack on muscle size than others.  Some certainly do.  It’s just that when a lifter is labelled a “hardgainer” he (or she) often resorts to the kind of training that may not necessarily be what they really need.  I won’t go into all of the details here for why I find that to be the case.  If you want more information on that , then read my essay from last year “ The Myth of the Hardgainer .”      The gist of my theory, however, is that many lifters struggle to pack on muscle size because they do standard high-volume workouts, only to find that sort of training doesn’t work for them.  After that, they proceed to low-frequency, “high-intensity” workouts, but those don’t work, either.  It’s at that point that the lifter, or his lif...

Tailoring Your Workout Program - Part Two

Tips and Advice for Tailoring Your Training Routine Part 2: Selecting a Program      In post-modern philosophy, there is a term that is important to understand.  I’m not a post-modernist myself—I am, if anything, an integralist , one who integrates different philosophies, East and West, into a singular whole—but I feel this concept is important.  It’s called “the myth of the given.”  The “myth” is when we take our given perception of things to be how they actually are.  We do this more often than we think.  It’s easy to understand this concept when it comes to simple objects, but less so when it comes to ideas.  We may not like how something tastes—raw oysters,for example—so we think oysters are simply bad.  Others, however, may love raw oysters—I could eat them by the bucket.  In this instance, it’s easy to see the myth of the given at work.  Even though you may find oysters personally unsettling, and it befuddles yo...