How Classic
Bodybuilders Gained Mass, Sculpted Their Physiques, and Achieved Fantastic
Condition!
Ever since I
first picked up a muscle magazine in the 1980s, I have loved the old-school,
classic bodybuilders from the decades that came before me. I realize that I’m old enough that even my
training heyday of the ‘90s is now considered “old-school,” which, if I’m being
entirely honest, seems quite odd to me. However,
when I think of old-school, I think of the “silver era” of bodybuilding
(roughly the ‘40s and ‘50s) along with the “golden age” of bodybuilding (‘60s
and ‘70s).
I still love
those eras. I love writing about those
eras. I love reading about those
eras. I love the training from those
eras.
I think that the
training wisdom from those bygone days of bodybuilding glory has a lot to offer
the modern bodybuilder, especially the drug-free one. I also think there’s a lot of confusion about
the training of the silver-era and golden-age bodybuilders. Sometimes downright misinformation.
Truth be told,
when I first read some of the programs of many of those eras’ top bodybuilders,
I thought one of two things, sometimes both together. Because of the sheer amount of volume they
utilized—in both a single workout and over the course of a week of training—I
thought that (a) they were genetic freaks who could handle that amount of
training and/or (b) they were ignorant of “proper” training, causing them to do
too much work because they simply didn’t know any better. The truth, however, is that I was the
ignorant one that didn’t know better.
Those top bodybuilders took years to build up to that amount of
workload. They were pretty systematic
about it, too.
For the remainder
of this essay, I would like to discuss the “secrets” that allowed those
old-school bodybuilders to not just handle what we might consider an “insane”
amount of volume and intensity, but that also allowed them to build massive,
powerful, and lean physiques with little to no performance enhancing
drugs. I have a feeling that many
bodybuilders today think of old-school, “classic” bodybuilding the way that I
did at first. But the truth is that most
modern bodybuilders—at least, once again, the drug-free ones—would be better
off training the old-school way than whatever it is they are currently
doing.
The Methods that Built the Muscle
Old-school
methodology was actually fairly simple and straightforward. Not easy by any stretch of the
imagination, mind you, which is one reason that many bodybuilders won’t follow
it even if they know it will produce better results than whatever-it-is they
are currently doing. What follows is how a great many of the bodybuilders
trained from the ‘40s up until the ‘70s.
Now, I realize that this is somewhat of a generalization, as there were
some different methods utilized by some of the lifters, and some of the
old-school bodybuilders didn’t follow the pattern I’m going to reveal here. But they would have been the outliers. Also, even within this system, there would be
some bodybuilders who did more work. And
some who did less. But the system
itself was almost universal.
For the most
part, there were three stages to their training. First, they built their physiques (by and
large) through full-body workouts performed 3 days a week. And this is not just something they did for
the first 6 months of their training, or even the first year. They utilized full-body workouts for
several years before switching over to a different mode of training. These full-body workouts were comprised of
big, bang-for-your-buck movements, too—different varieties of squats, bench
presses, overhead presses, cleans, snatches, deadlifts, and curls; done with
barbells and dumbbells. (Oh, and
sometimes even kettlebells, if you think that’s something that wasn’t utilized
until more recently in our training history.) As they progressed, they did more-and-more
work until they had built up not just an impressive physique, but one that
could handle a hefty workload.
During their use
of full-body workouts for the first few years of training, they focused on bulk
and power. They worked on getting as
strong as possible on all the aforementioned movements. They ate a lot of food and got big, sometimes
downright massive, but not fat. Although
they ate a lot, they made sure that their waistlines stayed in check. There were guys, of course, who took this too
far, but they always paid for it in the end because of how hard it was to get
the bodyfat off. Old-school lifters
gained plenty of bulk and were “smooth” but not soft. You could still see the muscles. They didn’t want them to lie beneath too much
fat. Old-school they might have been, but
they were still bodybuilders who prized aesthetics.
After several
years of this bulk and power training, once they had achieved their desired
size, they then switched over to the 2nd stage of training:
specialization on lagging bodyparts.
There were some various ways in which to do this, but the most common
was to continue training mainly full-body workouts 3 days a week, but
with a difference. They would save their
bodyparts that needed improvement for another 3 days of training, on alternate
days. If your shoulders and calves were
the muscle groups lagging behind the others, then you might train your chest,
back, quads, hamstrings, biceps, triceps, and abs Monday, Wednesday, and
Friday, in a manner similar to what you had been doing with full-body sessions. Then, on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday, you
would really blast your shoulders and calves to bring up those weak areas. Now, after doing this for 8-12 weeks—the
length of time spent on a particular specialization varied according to the
lifter—you would then re-evaluate your physique and would often go to another
bodypart or two that needed improvement and specialize on that bodypart (or
two) for another cycle of specialization training. You would continue with this approach for
however long it took to build a massive, but balanced, physique. It was then time for the 3rd
stage…
At this point,
the bodybuilder focused on definition, conditioning, and endurance while still
adding more, quality size if needed.
They did this through 2-way split workouts, training one half of the
body on one day and the other half on the next, often training 6 days per week,
3 days per muscle group. The workouts at
this point were chock full of a lot of work, often doing many sets per muscle
group. These were the sort of workouts
that I read about as a young, aspiring bodybuilder. And dismissed. But the old-school ‘builder could handle it
because he had taken the time over many years to really build up his work
capacity so that, not only could he handle it, but he thrived on it.
These workouts at
the “last” stage weren’t, however, what might now be considered “pre-contest”
workouts. They didn’t just focus
on definition and symmetry at this point.
In fact, most of these workouts were what we now commonly call “power
bodybuilding” or just power building workouts.
I thought about
all of this recently when I was reading John McCallum’s “The Complete Keys to
Progress.” I’ve written about my love
for this book recently, but if you’re not familiar with it, it’s a collection
of columns that McCallum wrote for Strength & Health magazine in the
‘60s. And if you read it straight
through, you notice something: it follows the same system we’re discussing
here. His columns for the first couple
of years were almost entirely focused on different forms of 3 day a week,
full-body workouts. Then, he wrote
columns for another year or so that were mainly centered on different forms of
specialization. Then, his final columns
were all about training for size and definition and endurance. Oh, and health! That’s another thing about this form of
training. Old-school bodybuilders
believed in not just being big and strong but being lean and in good
shape. If you had problems walking up
flights of stairs or going for a long, several-mile hike, then you were
considered out of shape.
I must note one
other thing before wrapping this up.
Although I write of these different stages, it might be best to think of
them, not as linear steps, but circular phases.
Old-school bodybuilders would often return to full-body workouts and specialization
routines after a long time spent on “advanced” splits. I think that’s a sound approach for all
bodybuilders.
The methods used
by old-school bodybuilders are still good to this day. As far as I’m concerned, when it comes to
hypertrophy, the old-school way is still the way.
Momently i am rereading John McCallum´s book (for the 5th or 6th time). I love it. It´s magic, full of wisdom and FUNNY. Nothing gives you more old school knowledge (except the get big drink:-) ) . For me it is pure gold.....LG Markus from Germany
ReplyDeleteMarkus, I must agree wholeheartedly! McCallum is a joy to read, not just for the information and training wisdom, but for the humor. The stories involving his daughter's boyfriend, for instance, always bring a smile to my face.
DeleteAlso, I think that every time I re-read it, it seems that I find some nugget of wisdom that I missed on other readings.
Yes, definitely pure gold.
So true. And don´t forget "Uncle Harry". This guy make me laugh at most. AND from real life stories Maurice Jones impresses me totally
DeleteYeah, Uncle Harry is great. In many ways, he reminds me of Bill Starr's "Uncle Buddy." The exception being that Starr's uncle was as knowledgeable as he was about lifting. Must be something to having an eccentric uncle that inspires a strength-training writer, as my Uncle Kirk often fills the same role for me.
DeleteNow, Maurice Jones is an old-school bodybuilder that I need to do an article about. He was truly one of the great pre-steroid mass monsters. Natural bodybuilders today could learn a thing or two from him.