Skip to main content

Thursday Throwback: The MYTHS of MIGHT

      I am currently working on some writing projects that are still keeping me away from the blog.  I hope to get back to more regular writing in a week or two.  Until then, I thought today - being Thursday and all - would be a good time for another "Throwback" article.

     This was published in 2003 in IronMan Magazine.   I actually got some "hate" from disgruntled readers after it was published, probably dealing with the fact that it doesn't paint "bodybuilding" in a very good light from a strictly "strength and power" perspective.  Since I wrote this over 20 years ago, I would probably change at least a couple of points if I was to re-write it, and I would change some of the "terminology" to fit in with recent advances in strength training.  Also, reading it again made me realize that I write better now than I did then (and not so hyperbolically), but I decided to just re-post it as originally written.  This way, it also gives you a better taste for the "state of training" 20 years ago.


The Myths of Might
A young Bill Starr in lifting action.  Starr and Westside founder Louie Simmons were the two biggest influences on my training, and writing, when the following was penned.


     If you’ve been bodybuilding for a long time, listening to your buddies at the gym and reading the garbage that appears in bodybuilding magazines, and you have not given any serious thought to powerlifting or "strength-event" training, the warning at right is for you. (C.S.'s note: I have NO clue what the "warning at the right" is/was, but I assume it was a part of the article that IronMan placed in quotes at the beginning of the piece.) The fact is, almost all of the trainees at your local health club know virtually zero when it comes to getting truly strong. That doesn’t have to be you.
     Read the following myths, trust in the truth of what is said, and if you’re still not a believer, try the sample workout, and I guarantee you’ll become one.

Myth 1: Bodybuilding is a good way to build strength.
     Yeah, I know. I just ticked off a whole slew of you. The truth is, though, that bodybuilding training, as it’s done by the average pro in today’s era of going-for-the-pump with high-rep non-free-weight exercises, does not build much strength and power. Sure, you get stronger than if you’d never picked up a weight, but you won’t be anywhere near as strong as you’d be if you followed a true strength program.
     Most of your average bodybuilders know absolutely nothing about dynamic, or explosive-rep, training, lifting with ultra-low reps, or the proper exercises to use for assistance work. They also know very little about how to regulate volume properly. They just train a muscle as hard as they can, thrash it, and then give it a week or so to recover after that.
     Famed powerlifting coach Louie Simmons once wrote that "bodybuilding has ruined strength training in America." He caught a lot of flak for it, but he had a point. And the point was that modern-day bodybuilding is the least effective way to train with weights and build speed, power, strength, and conditioning.

Myth 2: Training for muscle mass is the same as training for strength.
     This myth is closely tied in with the first one, and it’s the ultimate reason that bodybuilding training is not very efficient at building strength. It’s perpetuated largely because of the obvious correlation between weight training and strength. If you train for muscle mass, you’ll often gain some strength, and if you train for strength, you’ll often gain some muscle. That last part is not absolute because there are ways to avoid building muscle when you’re in a strength-training program.
     The requirements for increasing the size of a muscle cell are flat-out different from those for making a muscle stronger. Bodybuilders favor - among other things - higher reps, slower speed of movement, relatively higher sets, going for the pump and a good deal of recuperative time between workouts, which they need with that kind of training. That doesn’t mean those are the best ways to train for strength, however. I think there are better ways to gain muscle mass too, but that’s an entirely different article. To get results with a strength-training program, you have to include these elements: quick movements, low reps, more-frequent training and fewer sets per muscle group. The Russians did a lot of research into building muscle and strength, and they came up with three distinct ways to train: the dynamic effort method, the repetition method, and the maximum effort method. Bodybuilding programs focus on only one of those methods - repetition training - and thus neglect the other two, which happen to be the best for methods building strength and power.

Myth 3: Nutrition is the most important aspect of building strength.
     Pick your jaw off the floor. That’s no misprint. In bodybuilding circles, common wisdom holds that nutrition is 75 percent of success in weight training, while the training itself is only 25 percent. The fact is, nutrition has very little to do with your success in moving a lot of heavy iron. How can that be? And if I’m right, why have you been shoveling six meals a day down your throat and counting your protein intake as if your life were at stake?
     To begin with, nutrition is more important for bodybuilding purposes than it is for strength building. When it comes to intense strength training, such as that done by powerlifters and strongman competitors, however, nutrition really isn’t that big of a deal.
     You don’t believe me? Just check out the many world-champion powerlifters, and you’ll find only one or two who actually count calories and protein. At Westside Barbell Club in Columbus, Ohio, Simmons and his followers don’t even begin to think about following a diet. They simply eat whatever they want. Are they successful? You bet. At the 2003 World Bench Press Championships they swept every single weight class. All from a little gym where the lifters don’t pay attention to what they eat.
     The Russian powerlifters have dominated the sport for years, and you know what? Some of them eat little more than bread and potatoes year-round, and they don’t get near as much protein as the Americans do. Yet they lift more than the rest of the world.
     Why isn’t nutrition important? The answer is fairly simple: It’s the training that’s important. Take two lifters of about the same weight, age, training experience and strength. Put one of them on a bodybuilding program and a strict nutritional regimen, and put the other on a proven strength regimen and let him eat - or not eat - whatever he wants. You know who will be the strongest at the end of the program? Without a doubt the second lifter.
     A lot of strength programs focus on increasing neural strength and making the motor units fire "faster" and more efficiently. There’s no secret diet you can follow that will make your body move heavy iron with force more efficiently.

Myth 4: Split routines are the most effective way to make progress.
     Once again, I’ve probably upset a lot of people, especially those who follow multiple-split routines. You know, the ones where you train one muscle group a day in order to prioritize it and give it a lot of rest? The most effective way to train is with a whole-body workout, and that goes double for strength athletes who also compete in team sports such as football or basketball. If you’re new to strength training, just give a Bill Starr-style program a go. Stick with it for a couple of months, and I guarantee you’ll be a believer. Starr’s approach is based on training the entire body three times-per-week using a heavy / light / medium rotation. For advanced athletes he believes in four days of whole-body training for the very reason that it works your whole body. How many football players go out on the field on Saturday afternoon and just use their quadriceps? Or their biceps? None. If you compete in full-body sports, you need to condition yourself with full-body weight-training sessions.
     What’s more, you’ll never be in good condition - and you’re not necessarily in good condition just because you can see your abs - unless you train your body as a unit. Do you think that training your chest all by itself, without working any other muscle group, is going to get you in shape to go out on a basketball court several times a week and play effectively? Of course it won’t.
     If you do follow a split program, then just split your body in half, using an upper/lower split. Train your upper body on one day and your lower body the next. Rest one day, and then repeat the split. Rest two days, and begin the cycle again. Keep it simple.
     If you want to gain strength on a split routine, take a look at the routines of elite powerlifters. All of them stick with a two-way split. You may want to consider, however, that the Russian powerlifters almost always use whole-body workouts, and Olympic lifters never split their programs.

Myth 5: A slow rep speed is just as effective as a faster one.
     I had to include this one, although it’s not as prevalent as the others. It’s mainly perpetuated by lifters and writers from the "high-intensity" school of thought. Those same people are quick to point out the importance of specificity in training except where it applies to rep speed. Some of them even take it to the extreme, recommending super slow reps that exceed five seconds.
     Keep this in mind: Training slow will make you slow. If you want to be really powerful, not just strong, you need to incorporate some type of speed training into your program. For instance, if you always train with really low reps, then your rep speed will of necessity be slow. If you do that consistently over several weeks, then you’ll be teaching your muscle to move the weight slowly, and as a result you’ll get weaker. You need speed work.
     As a side note, when you perform speed work, try to keep your repetitions to no more than five. More than that, and you start to slow down, as your reps just don’t have the power that the first ones had.

Myth 6: In order to optimize strength and mass gains, you need to train each muscle group infrequently.
     Every time you train, and train properly, by regulating your volume many good things happen to your muscles thanks to the anabolic environment that occurs in your body for the next 36 hours or so after training. These thingss include protein synthesis and increased testosterone, IGF-1, prostaglandins and other anti-catabolic factors. After three days, you’re reduced to what’s at best a semi-catabolic state. So when you allow yourself to recover for a week, you’re just not taking advantage of this anabolic environment.
     There are better ways to optimize your recovery and, therefore, your strength gains. The best course is to add a light workout (or a couple) in addition to your heavy session. Once again, I recommend Bill Starr’s programs.
     If you’re really serious about strength training, you need to separate your speed workout. In addition, when you use really low reps for both dynamic sessions and maximum effort sessions, you place far less strain on your muscles. You don’t do any traumatic tissue damage, as you do with repetition workouts. You simply don’t get as sore, so you’re ready to lift again after two to three days of rest.
     If you have a body part that lags behind the others in strength gains, try adding some extra sessions. For example, say you train your upper body two days a week, using a speed workout on Monday and a heavy, maximum-effort workout on Thursday, and your lagging body part is chest. Try adding a light workout on Saturday, something like 30 percent of your maximum weight on the bench press for 12 sets of four reps each. After a few weeks add another light workout on Tuesday, say 10 sets of push-ups for five reps each.
     If you don’t get anything else out of the "busting" of this myth, at least understand that there are better ways to recover than just sitting around watching television and claiming that you can’t help around the house because you have to recuperate.

Myth 7: You cannot gain a lot of mass and a lot of strength at the same time.
     Despite my previous comments regarding the difference between training for mass and training for strength, a lot of lifters and writers are wrong when they perpetuate this myth. All you have to do is look at the super heavyweight powerlifters or Olympic lifters or any of the World’s Strongest Man competitors.
     At the Westside Barbell Club the main complaint from some of the lifters is that they gain too much muscle and have to move up two or three weight classes. And that’s despite their efforts to keep that from happening. The added mass is simply a by-product of their training.
     Old-time lifters like Doug Hepburn and Pat Casey were very good at gaining both strength and muscle. The key was that they performed all their low rep strength work first. Then, when their nervous systems were properly heightened, they did their repetition work.
     You can do the same. Whether it’s a heavy session or a speed workout, do your repetition work after your low rep work. Just don’t go overboard with the number of sets. Four to five sets maximum should be optimal.
     Now that we’ve busted some of the most basic myths about building strength, let’s design a program that puts your new knowledge to use.

Pure Power Routine
This workout is designed with competitive powerlifters in mind, but it will be equally effective for beginning lifters who need to use a full body workout or for bodybuilders at any level who have only trained with repetition workouts to this point. The bottom line, however, is that it’s a good all-around routine for anyone who wants to focus on strength and power alone.
You perform the workout three-times-per-week. The most popular schedule is Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
Workout 1: Dynamic/Repetition
Speed squats 10 x 2
Speed benches 8 x 3
Power cleans 6 x 3
Chinups 4 x 6-8
Parallel bar dips 3 x 8-10
Hanging leg raises 3 x 20

Workout 2: Light/Recovery
Front squats 8 x 3
Explosive rep push-ups 8 x 3
Pullovers 3 x 10
Cable Curls 3 x 10
Steep-incline sit-ups 3 x 20

Workout 3: Heavy/Maximum effort
Bottom position squats or sumo deadlifts 5-8 x 1 - 3
Bottom position bench presses, rack lockouts or incline presses 5-8 x 1 - 3
Bent over rows 4 x 6 - 8
Skull crushers 3 x 10
Barbell curls 3 x 10
Hanging leg raises 3 x 20

Summing It Up
     Hopefully you come away from this discussion with a better understanding of real strength training. Despite the apparent similarities, there are some striking differences between strength training and bodybuilding. The better you understand that, the better you’ll be at either one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Marvin Eder’s Mass-Building Methods

  The Many and Varied Mass-Building Methods of Power Bodybuilding’s G.O.A.T. Eder as he appeared in my article "Full Body Workouts" for IronMan  magazine.      In many ways, the essay you are now reading is the one that has had the “longest time coming.”  I have no clue why it has taken me this long to write an article specifically on Marvin Eder, especially considering the fact that I have long considered him the greatest bodybuilder cum strength athlete of all friggin’ time .  In fact, over 20 years ago, I wrote this in the pages of IronMan magazine: In my opinion, the greatest all-around bodybuilder, powerlifter and strength athlete ever to walk the planet, Eder had 19-inch arms at a bodyweight of 198. He could bench 510, squat 550 for 10 reps and do a barbell press with 365. He was reported to have achieved the amazing feat of cranking out 1,000 dips in only 17 minutes. Imagine doing a dip a second for 17 minutes. As Gene Mozee once put it, “Modern bodybuilders couldn’t

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Don Howorth's Formula for Wide, Massive Shoulders Vintage picture of Don Howorth in competition shape. I can't remember the first time I laid eyes on Howorth's massive physique with those absolutely friggin' awesomely shaped "cannonball" shoulders of his, but it was probably sometime in the late '80s and early '90s, when I read about him in either IronMan Magazine  or MuscleMag International .  IronMan  had regular "Mass from the Past" articles written by Gene Mozee that had a couple of articles about Howorth's training*, and he was also mentioned fairly regularly in Vince Gironda's column for MuscleMag  not to mention in some of the articles of Greg Zulak for the same publication. There is no doubt that genetics played a big role in just how fantastic Howorth's delts looked, but to claim Howorth's results were just because of genetics or anabolic steroids - as I've read claimed on some internet forums - is a l

Classic Bodybuilding: The Natural Power-Bodybuilding Methods of Chuck Sipes

Chuck Sipes as he appeared in the pages of the original Ironman Magazine. For a while now, I have wanted to write a piece on one of my favorite bodybuilders of all time: Chuck Sipes. I had relented in doing so until now only because there are so many good pieces that you can find on the internet just from doing a cursory search. But I finally figured, you know, what the hell, you can never have too much Chuck Sipes. Also, in addition to my own memories and thoughts on Sipes' totally bad-a training, I've tried to find some of the best information from various sites, and include a lot of that here. For those of you that don't know much about Sipes, he was one of a kind. I know that's a bit cliché, and I've used such terms before when it comes to other "classic bodybuilders", but there was nothing cliché about Sipes, so it's completely true in this instance. Don't believe me? Then read on. First off, he was natural. In fact, he was one of the l