Skip to main content

The Way of the Modern Ronin, Part 11

 

Essays and Thoughts on The Dokkodo

Part Eleven

Do Not Allow Yourself to be Guided by Feelings of Lust or Love

The Dokkodo in its original handwriting. (Courtesy of Wikimedia)



The further along we get in the Dokkodo, and the more we realize how different was the view of the ancient budoka compared with the mind and thought of the modern martial practitioner.  Here, we find a maxim that seems more harsh than all the others that came before it, cold even.  In our society (or I should write "societies" - for this goes for the East as well as the West), we are taught that romantic love is to be prized.  In fact, there are many whose entire life revolves around acquiring romantic love.
But love is fickle.  And fickleness is not a feeling that the serious martial practitioner can rely upon.  Upon this very subject, Roshi Richard Collins has this to say, "We have all perhaps made unwise decisions in our lives based on what we thought were the dictates of the heart.  We are taught, in fact, in countless works of literature and popular culture that we should be guided by the heart, or rather by sentiment.  Afraid of being accused of heartlessness, we sometimes accede to unwise actions or decisions that will actually in the end cause not only ourselves but also others more harm than good."  The warrior who follows the Way must only rely upon those feelings/emotions/things that are solid - and therefore the only things that are truly true!  Truth is solid in the sense that it is unchanging, and, therefore, can be relied upon.  And we learned from the previous maxim that the only thing we can truly rely upon are dharmas - eternal truths - and romantic love is not a dharma.


If you are familiar with Buddhist thought - or just Eastern thought in general - then at this point you may ask (and rightly so), "What about the Buddha's teachings on metta (loving-kindness; sometimes just translated as "love") and karuna (compassion)?  Are these not two emotions - along with joy and equanimity - that the Buddha encouraged his followers to develop?"  Well, yes... and no.  When the Buddha spoke of metta, what he espoused could best be translated as not just "loving-kindness" but as "universal love."  In the Christian tradition, we refer to this as "agape," the love that God has for all of Creation - and that followers of Christ reciprocate in return.  So Musashi here is not going against traditional Buddhist thought on this matter.


Notice, too, that Musashi doesn't say, "Do not allow yourself to have feelings of lust or love."  He is simply saying to not be guided by those feelings.  You could even argue that Musashi is allowing a bit of liberality here, since many Buddhists since the very time of the historical Buddha Shakyamuni have espoused having NO feelings of lust or love toward the opposite sex.  Buddhist monks in Southeast Asia to this day do not even allow themselves to touch a member of the opposite sex.  No, what Musashi is trying to protect against here is what we might call (in modern parlance) an addiction to sex, whether that addiction is to the brothels of his day (lust) or to relationships (love).  If he was writing the Dokkodo today, he would probably have to admonish his followers to stay away from pornography, for instance, because it's a modern problem that can detract the budoka from his/her path, and the warrior's path is to follow his/her particular martial way, not feelings of lust or romantic love.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Bodybuilding: Serge Nubret's "Chase the Pump" Training

For those of you who are my age or older, you can probably remember well the first time you saw the amazing physique of Serge Nubret: It was in the pseudo-documentary we all now know and love as “Pumping Iron.”  With the director and writers of Pumping Iron attempting to make out the film as a “David vs Goliath” with the young (but massive) Lou Ferrigno taking on the older “Goliath” in the form of Arnold Schwarzenegger, they had no idea that their whole half-true enterprise would crumble a bit with the entry of Serge Nubret. You took one look at Nubret and you knew there was no doubt that Ferrigno was out of his league with both Schwarzenegger and the Frenchmen.  (Nubret was French.) Nubret - to this day - had one of the most classically beautiful physiques of all-time.  Arnold, of course, won the whole thing, but Nubret easily came in 2nd. By the time I watched Pumping Iron sometime in the mid to late ‘80s, there was very little information that I could fin...

High-Set, Low-Rep Workout Variations for Size and Strength

Variations in Training with 8 to 10 Sets of 3 to 5 Reps      I have written many times that I believe the best form of training—at least, when it comes to building boatloads of both massive size and serious strength—is high-set, low-rep training.  If someone is starting out with this method of lifting, I generally advise 8 to 10 sets of 3 to 5 reps.  The reps are low enough to build strength—if you want to be really strong and powerful, then it’s essential to do most of your training with 5 reps or lower.  For instance, in my recent Go Heavy or Go Home essay, I discussed Pavel Tsatsouline’s 7 “Russian rules” of strength training.  And rule #2 is “you must limit your reps to 5.”  But to build muscle mass, you need (along with the low reps) a volume high enough to generate a hypertrophic response.  That’s where the (relatively) high sets come in.  To paraphrase Pavel again: “If you get a pump with heavy weights, you’ll get b...

In Praise of High-Sets, Low-Reps

     This week, it seems that I've received an inordinate number of e-mails.  Most of them have been related to questions regarding my latest article at Mike Mahler's website.  (If you haven't read that article—see the post a couple below this one—be sure to do so; and make sure that you check out Mike's site.  He's got a lot of good stuff there.)  I've been too busy to answer all of them—but I'll be sure to do so by the end of the weekend (hopefully).      Anyway, I received an e-mail earlier today asking me what the single greatest "approach" is for building muscle mass.  In other words, what kind of workout program seems to elicit the best gains in both building muscle mass and garnering strength gains.  I started to answer with one of the more popular lines from strength coaches (and one of the most redundant):  "The best workout program is the one you're not doing."      Then I decided that was a bit of a cop-out.      Truth is, ...