Skip to main content

The Way of the Modern Ronin, Part 11

 

Essays and Thoughts on The Dokkodo

Part Eleven

Do Not Allow Yourself to be Guided by Feelings of Lust or Love

The Dokkodo in its original handwriting. (Courtesy of Wikimedia)



The further along we get in the Dokkodo, and the more we realize how different was the view of the ancient budoka compared with the mind and thought of the modern martial practitioner.  Here, we find a maxim that seems more harsh than all the others that came before it, cold even.  In our society (or I should write "societies" - for this goes for the East as well as the West), we are taught that romantic love is to be prized.  In fact, there are many whose entire life revolves around acquiring romantic love.
But love is fickle.  And fickleness is not a feeling that the serious martial practitioner can rely upon.  Upon this very subject, Roshi Richard Collins has this to say, "We have all perhaps made unwise decisions in our lives based on what we thought were the dictates of the heart.  We are taught, in fact, in countless works of literature and popular culture that we should be guided by the heart, or rather by sentiment.  Afraid of being accused of heartlessness, we sometimes accede to unwise actions or decisions that will actually in the end cause not only ourselves but also others more harm than good."  The warrior who follows the Way must only rely upon those feelings/emotions/things that are solid - and therefore the only things that are truly true!  Truth is solid in the sense that it is unchanging, and, therefore, can be relied upon.  And we learned from the previous maxim that the only thing we can truly rely upon are dharmas - eternal truths - and romantic love is not a dharma.


If you are familiar with Buddhist thought - or just Eastern thought in general - then at this point you may ask (and rightly so), "What about the Buddha's teachings on metta (loving-kindness; sometimes just translated as "love") and karuna (compassion)?  Are these not two emotions - along with joy and equanimity - that the Buddha encouraged his followers to develop?"  Well, yes... and no.  When the Buddha spoke of metta, what he espoused could best be translated as not just "loving-kindness" but as "universal love."  In the Christian tradition, we refer to this as "agape," the love that God has for all of Creation - and that followers of Christ reciprocate in return.  So Musashi here is not going against traditional Buddhist thought on this matter.


Notice, too, that Musashi doesn't say, "Do not allow yourself to have feelings of lust or love."  He is simply saying to not be guided by those feelings.  You could even argue that Musashi is allowing a bit of liberality here, since many Buddhists since the very time of the historical Buddha Shakyamuni have espoused having NO feelings of lust or love toward the opposite sex.  Buddhist monks in Southeast Asia to this day do not even allow themselves to touch a member of the opposite sex.  No, what Musashi is trying to protect against here is what we might call (in modern parlance) an addiction to sex, whether that addiction is to the brothels of his day (lust) or to relationships (love).  If he was writing the Dokkodo today, he would probably have to admonish his followers to stay away from pornography, for instance, because it's a modern problem that can detract the budoka from his/her path, and the warrior's path is to follow his/her particular martial way, not feelings of lust or romantic love.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Before we get started on this "Classic Bodybuilding" piece, one word of note:  If you really  pay attention to this blog, then you will notice that in the "sub-header" at the top of the page, I have added "Ageless Bodybuilding" as one of the subjects that will be discussed.  This is for a decided reason... I have been developing a system of training that I have been using on myself and a few "older" lifters that occasionally train with me, but still follow my training program that I have them using even when they are training at a commercial gym instead of my "garage gym".  This system is for those of you who are 40+ such as myself, but it may be even more effective for those of you 50 and older.  In fact, of my two occasional training partners, one of them is 51, and the other is 55. I wouldn't be so arrogant as to call this ageless bodybuilding system  revolutionary, but I can say that it is radically different from most syste

Old School Arm Training Secrets: John McWilliams's Arm Training Routine

Old-School Arm Training Secrets: John McWilliams’s Arm Routine      My most popular posts here at Integral Strength typically fall into two categories: old-school bodybuilding programs or serious strength and power routines.      With that in mind, I thought I would do a series of articles on various old-school lifters and bodybuilders (the two overlapped once-upon-a-time), and on various old-school methods for training different bodyparts or lifts.   Thus, this first entry is on old-school arm training, but others will be on old-school chest, shoulders, back, legs, squats, bench presses, overhead presses, power cleans, etc.   And for this first entry, I decided upon an old-school bodybuilder cum powerlifter that many of you may never have heard of: John McWilliams. McWilliams's back double-biceps pose.  He was impressive even in his 40s.      When I first came across an article about McWilliams (written by Gene Mozee) in the early ‘90s, I had certainly neve

Classic Bodybuilding: The Natural Power-Bodybuilding Methods of Chuck Sipes

Chuck Sipes as he appeared in the pages of the original Ironman Magazine. For a while now, I have wanted to write a piece on one of my favorite bodybuilders of all time: Chuck Sipes. I had relented in doing so until now only because there are so many good pieces that you can find on the internet just from doing a cursory search. But I finally figured, you know, what the hell, you can never have too much Chuck Sipes. Also, in addition to my own memories and thoughts on Sipes' totally bad-a training, I've tried to find some of the best information from various sites, and include a lot of that here. For those of you that don't know much about Sipes, he was one of a kind. I know that's a bit cliché, and I've used such terms before when it comes to other "classic bodybuilders", but there was nothing cliché about Sipes, so it's completely true in this instance. Don't believe me? Then read on. First off, he was natural. In fact, he was one of the l