Skip to main content

The Way of the Modern Ronin, Part 3

 Essays and Thoughts on the "Dokkodo"
Part Three
Do Not Seek Pleasure for its Own Sake

Miyamoto Musashi in his prime, wielding two bokken; woodblock print by Utagawa Kuniyoshi (courtesy of Wikimedia)

The 2nd maxim of Musashi's Dokkodo is "do not seek pleasure for its own sake."  When I first read the Dokkodo many years ago, this one struck me as a little odd, or I probably thought it was too "outdated" - a maxim from ancient Japan that didn't apply to us today in the modern world.  But I couldn't have been more wrong.

First off, don't try to make this maxim - or the others that follow - more or less than what they are.  Most of these - as with all teachings from a Wisdom Tradition - have both the "surface" meaning, and that which is "below the surface", so to speak.

On it's "surface", this maxim is fairly simple and straightforward.  When you seek pleasure for the sake of pleasure alone, you WILL run into all sorts of trouble!  This should be obvious - but sometimes we quite literally don't see what is right in front of our noses.

Pleasure, of itself, is neither good nor bad.  And pleasure should NEVER be something that you avoid because you think it's "sinful", or it makes you have feelings of guilt.  Pleasure is, by its very nature, "neutral" - it arises with "good" and "bad" things.  Sometimes pleasure will arise from a hard workout - whether with weights, or in martial arts - or from a session of zazen.  But it can also arise in some individuals via "bad" things, such as theft or even murder!  You might say to yourself, at this point, "Well, I would never take pleasure from killing!"  That may be true, but let's take a look at the standard 5 precepts that all Zen students vow to keep:
  1. No Killing
  2. No Stealing
  3. No Lying
  4. No Improper Sexual Conduct
  5. No abuse of intoxicants
Okay, you're thinking, well, that's easy enough!  But a couple of caveats must be noted.  First, "no killing" means that you vow to not kill any living being.  Did you step on a few ants walking to your car this morning?  Did you turn on your "bug zapper" the other Saturday night, for your local neighborhood cookout?  Or swat at a mosquito at said cookout?  Or maybe you called your local pest control company to eradicate the mosquitos, and other "critters", before the cookout?
Guess what?  ALL of those "transgress" the precept.  Which brings us to the 2nd point here (and this is the "main" point): It all comes down to intention.  If you intended to kill a sentient being - and, yes, even roaches and mosquitos count here - then you are guilty of transgressing this precept.  On the flip side, if you're grilling some veggies for your cookout, and a few stray mosquitoes, flies, or other insects meet their demise at the hands of your charcoal fire pit, then you're NOT guilty of any transgression - there was no intention to harm.  The same holds true for a sparring session at the dojo - if you accidentally break your sparring partner's nose, but had no intention of doing so, then you haven't transgressed the precept.  But if you try to hurt your sparring partner - let's say you lose your cool because of how hard he hit you - and fail to do so, then you have still transgressed it.

Back to our maxim, and the point brought up about obeying the precepts.  You may now realize that there is more to this "Do not seek pleasure for its own sake" maxim than at first glance - more nuanced and subtle.

As with all of the Dokkodo, each maxim, the more it is explored internally and mused over, begins to slowly unveil its truth to the Budo practitioner.  Let's look at some of the more "surface" benefits to practicing this maxim:

If you are training for the sake of pleasure alone, then you will never be able to fully "give yourself" to the training.  Pleasure may be a "side effect" of Budo training, but it should never be the goal.  The goal is to strive for perfection, even if that means there is some inherit pain involved.

If you seek pleasure in things outside of your training, then you risk being sucked into idle pursuits that will never help you to achieve your goals.  As it says in the book of Matthew:
"Small is the gate and narrow is the road that leads to life, but few find it."*


*Matthew 7:14

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Bodybuilding: Serge Nubret's "Chase the Pump" Training

For those of you who are my age or older, you can probably remember well the first time you saw the amazing physique of Serge Nubret: It was in the pseudo-documentary we all now know and love as “Pumping Iron.”  With the director and writers of Pumping Iron attempting to make out the film as a “David vs Goliath” with the young (but massive) Lou Ferrigno taking on the older “Goliath” in the form of Arnold Schwarzenegger, they had no idea that their whole half-true enterprise would crumble a bit with the entry of Serge Nubret. You took one look at Nubret and you knew there was no doubt that Ferrigno was out of his league with both Schwarzenegger and the Frenchmen.  (Nubret was French.) Nubret - to this day - had one of the most classically beautiful physiques of all-time.  Arnold, of course, won the whole thing, but Nubret easily came in 2nd. By the time I watched Pumping Iron sometime in the mid to late ‘80s, there was very little information that I could fin...

High-Set, Low-Rep Workout Variations for Size and Strength

Variations in Training with 8 to 10 Sets of 3 to 5 Reps      I have written many times that I believe the best form of training—at least, when it comes to building boatloads of both massive size and serious strength—is high-set, low-rep training.  If someone is starting out with this method of lifting, I generally advise 8 to 10 sets of 3 to 5 reps.  The reps are low enough to build strength—if you want to be really strong and powerful, then it’s essential to do most of your training with 5 reps or lower.  For instance, in my recent Go Heavy or Go Home essay, I discussed Pavel Tsatsouline’s 7 “Russian rules” of strength training.  And rule #2 is “you must limit your reps to 5.”  But to build muscle mass, you need (along with the low reps) a volume high enough to generate a hypertrophic response.  That’s where the (relatively) high sets come in.  To paraphrase Pavel again: “If you get a pump with heavy weights, you’ll get b...

In Praise of High-Sets, Low-Reps

     This week, it seems that I've received an inordinate number of e-mails.  Most of them have been related to questions regarding my latest article at Mike Mahler's website.  (If you haven't read that article—see the post a couple below this one—be sure to do so; and make sure that you check out Mike's site.  He's got a lot of good stuff there.)  I've been too busy to answer all of them—but I'll be sure to do so by the end of the weekend (hopefully).      Anyway, I received an e-mail earlier today asking me what the single greatest "approach" is for building muscle mass.  In other words, what kind of workout program seems to elicit the best gains in both building muscle mass and garnering strength gains.  I started to answer with one of the more popular lines from strength coaches (and one of the most redundant):  "The best workout program is the one you're not doing."      Then I decided that was a bit of a cop-out.      Truth is, ...