Skip to main content

The 3 to 5 Method for Specialization

Make Fantastic Gains by Using the 3 to 5 Method to Specialize on the Bodypart of your Choosing!

Here I am finishing off an old-school garage gym workout with some good ol' farmers walks.



For those of you unfamiliar with the "3 to 5 Method" of training that I have touted more than a few times on Integral Strength, the gist of it is this:
  • Train 3 to 5 days per week
  • Utilize 3 to 5 exercises at each workout
  • Perform 3 to 5 sets of each exercise
  • Perform 3 to 5 reps on each set

The 3 to 5 method of training is typically used along with a full-body workout.  As anyone who has done a fair amount of reading on this blog probably could have guessed, I would recommend using the "Big 4" while employing 3 to 5 training:
  • Squat something heavy every week
  • Press something heavy overhead every week
  • Pull something heavy off the ground every week
  • Drag or carry something heavy for either time or distance every week

It all adds up to a week of workouts that might look something such as the following:

  • Monday: squats, overhead presses, power cleans, dumbbell curls
  • Tuesday: deadlifts, dips, chins, sled drags
  • Wednesday: OFF
  • Thursday: power snatches, one-arm dumbbell overhead presses, front squats
  • Friday: OFF
  • Saturday: trap bar deadlifts, incline dumbbell bench presses, thick bar barbell curls, farmer walks


Now you may have noticed something by this point:  this is decidedly not a specialization program.  Rather, it's a really great way to add bulk, mass, and power (assuming you're consuming plenty of calorie-laden foods) or plenty of power and strength if you're keeping your calories low.  It's hard, simple, and - most important of all - highly effective.
However, it can make for one hell of a specialization program if you have a bodypart that is lagging behind others.  If this is the case, then simply perform a one-bodypart-only workout at every other session.  Once again, however, you will perform 3 to 5 exercises for that one bodypart, utilizing 3 to 5 sets of each exercise, and 3 to 5 reps on each set.
If chest, for instance, is your lagging bodypart, your workout would look like this:

  • Monday (first chest-only workout): flat barbell bench presses, wide-grip dips, incline dumbbell bench presses
  • Tuesday: front squats, thick-bar deadlifts, barbell curls, farmer walks
  • Wednesday (2nd chest-only session): incline barbell bench presses, "clapping" push-ups, flat dumbbell bench presses
  • Thursday: OFF
  • Friday: Bottom-position squats, chins, deficit sumo deadlifts, sled drags
  • Saturday (repeat of Monday's workout): flat barbell bench presses, wide-grip dips, incline dumbbell bench presses
  • Sunday: OFF

And, of course, on Monday you would perform another full-body workout.  You could perform the same workout from Tuesday of the previous week, or you could change it up and do something entirely different.

Keep in mind that the week of training above is just an example of the kind of training you would utilize on a "3 to 5 Specialization Method".  Without getting into a full week of example workouts, here are some more examples of specialization days you could do for other bodyparts.

Arms: thick bar barbell curls, lying triceps extension, dumbbell curls, close-grip dips

Back: wide-grip chins, barbell rows, power cleans, shrugs

Quads: bottom-position squats, sissy squats, walking barbell lunges, backward sled drags

Hopefully by this point, you have a decent understanding of how the 3 to 5 Method can be a wonderful way of specializing on any bodypart.  If you have one that is lagging, then spend 3 to 4 weeks of specializing before you switch back to a "straight forward" 3 to 5 Method for another 3 to 4 weeks.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Marvin Eder’s Mass-Building Methods

  The Many and Varied Mass-Building Methods of Power Bodybuilding’s G.O.A.T. Eder as he appeared in my article "Full Body Workouts" for IronMan  magazine.      In many ways, the essay you are now reading is the one that has had the “longest time coming.”  I have no clue why it has taken me this long to write an article specifically on Marvin Eder, especially considering the fact that I have long considered him the greatest bodybuilder cum strength athlete of all friggin’ time .  In fact, over 20 years ago, I wrote this in the pages of IronMan magazine: In my opinion, the greatest all-around bodybuilder, powerlifter and strength athlete ever to walk the planet, Eder had 19-inch arms at a bodyweight of 198. He could bench 510, squat 550 for 10 reps and do a barbell press with 365. He was reported to have achieved the amazing feat of cranking out 1,000 dips in only 17 minutes. Imagine doing a dip a second for 17 minutes. As Gene Mozee once put it, “Modern bodybuilders couldn’t

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Don Howorth's Formula for Wide, Massive Shoulders Vintage picture of Don Howorth in competition shape. I can't remember the first time I laid eyes on Howorth's massive physique with those absolutely friggin' awesomely shaped "cannonball" shoulders of his, but it was probably sometime in the late '80s and early '90s, when I read about him in either IronMan Magazine  or MuscleMag International .  IronMan  had regular "Mass from the Past" articles written by Gene Mozee that had a couple of articles about Howorth's training*, and he was also mentioned fairly regularly in Vince Gironda's column for MuscleMag  not to mention in some of the articles of Greg Zulak for the same publication. There is no doubt that genetics played a big role in just how fantastic Howorth's delts looked, but to claim Howorth's results were just because of genetics or anabolic steroids - as I've read claimed on some internet forums - is a l

Classic Bodybuilding: The Natural Power-Bodybuilding Methods of Chuck Sipes

Chuck Sipes as he appeared in the pages of the original Ironman Magazine. For a while now, I have wanted to write a piece on one of my favorite bodybuilders of all time: Chuck Sipes. I had relented in doing so until now only because there are so many good pieces that you can find on the internet just from doing a cursory search. But I finally figured, you know, what the hell, you can never have too much Chuck Sipes. Also, in addition to my own memories and thoughts on Sipes' totally bad-a training, I've tried to find some of the best information from various sites, and include a lot of that here. For those of you that don't know much about Sipes, he was one of a kind. I know that's a bit cliché, and I've used such terms before when it comes to other "classic bodybuilders", but there was nothing cliché about Sipes, so it's completely true in this instance. Don't believe me? Then read on. First off, he was natural. In fact, he was one of the l