Skip to main content

Happiness Sucks!

 Happiness Sucks and the Zen Way to Contentment

C.S. sitting on his zabuton as he prepares for meditation


I once read of a study dealing with music and happiness.  The study had two groups of participants listen to a composition of classical music.  The first group was told to simply listen to the music.  The second group was told to listen to the music and to try to have the music cultivate a sense of happiness within them while listening.  Afterwards, both groups were asked how happy listening to the music made them feel.  Interestingly, it was the first group that said they felt really happy while listening to the music.  The sense of simple bare attention, without attempting to alter the atmosphere through "being" happy, was enough to create happiness without effort.


We live in a culture - and this is especially true if you're like me and deal with the "health and wellness" community - that is in the middle of a "happiness boom".  But the truth is that the happiness simply isn't going to happen if it's forced.  In my last post on "nothing special", I mentioned that it is the very pursuit of happiness that keeps us as a human species trapped in endless cycles of disappointment and suffering.


We need to stop attempting to be happy and instead focus on alleviating our suffering.  When we do this, the happiness will be a natural byproduct.


One of the ways that we suffer in today's world is through the "thinking mind".  It's often not our situation that brings about suffering or pain or simple "dis-ease" with the world - rather, it's often what we think about our situation.  And the thinking mind that we own is very good about putting a negative spin on our situation.  Even if you're a naturally positive person, the sort of person that always sees the "glass-half-full" nature of things, this will eventually cause you pain and dissatisfaction, as well, because of the karmic nature of "what goes up, must come down".


Instead, true satisfaction and pleasure and, therefore, happiness can be found by simply letting go of thoughts of good or bad, right or wrong, this or that.  This is the reason that the 1st group of classical listeners above were naturally happy.  Without knowing it, they were resting in "don't know mind".


Don't Know Mind sees simply what is without attempting to spin it, change it, or, naturally, think about it.  This is where the practice of seated zazen can be helpful.  When you sit zazen, your goalless goal is to let go of thinking mind so that the true Nature of simply what is can emerge on its own.


Zen master Seung Sahn had this to say about don't know mind:

"Some Zen masters say you must keep great doubt, which is don't-know mind, I guess  But they say that there is a point where you must pass through great doubt and into great enlightenment.

"Great doubt is don't-know.  The names are different - great doubt, great question, great don't-know.  There are many many names.  My given name is Duk In, my monk's name is Heung Won, and my enlightenment name is Seung Sahn.  I have many names but none is my true name.  When I was born, I had no name.  The true name is no name. So great doubt, great question, don't know - they are all the same."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Before we get started on this "Classic Bodybuilding" piece, one word of note:  If you really  pay attention to this blog, then you will notice that in the "sub-header" at the top of the page, I have added "Ageless Bodybuilding" as one of the subjects that will be discussed.  This is for a decided reason... I have been developing a system of training that I have been using on myself and a few "older" lifters that occasionally train with me, but still follow my training program that I have them using even when they are training at a commercial gym instead of my "garage gym".  This system is for those of you who are 40+ such as myself, but it may be even more effective for those of you 50 and older.  In fact, of my two occasional training partners, one of them is 51, and the other is 55. I wouldn't be so arrogant as to call this ageless bodybuilding system  revolutionary, but I can say that it is radically different from most syste

Old School Arm Training Secrets: John McWilliams's Arm Training Routine

Old-School Arm Training Secrets: John McWilliams’s Arm Routine      My most popular posts here at Integral Strength typically fall into two categories: old-school bodybuilding programs or serious strength and power routines.      With that in mind, I thought I would do a series of articles on various old-school lifters and bodybuilders (the two overlapped once-upon-a-time), and on various old-school methods for training different bodyparts or lifts.   Thus, this first entry is on old-school arm training, but others will be on old-school chest, shoulders, back, legs, squats, bench presses, overhead presses, power cleans, etc.   And for this first entry, I decided upon an old-school bodybuilder cum powerlifter that many of you may never have heard of: John McWilliams. McWilliams's back double-biceps pose.  He was impressive even in his 40s.      When I first came across an article about McWilliams (written by Gene Mozee) in the early ‘90s, I had certainly neve

Old Time Mass Tactics: One-Exercise-Per-Bodypart Training

     Starting with the current post, I thought I would do a mini-series on how the "old-time" bodybuilders used to train.  In doing so, I also thought I would start with what I consider the greatest of the old-time mass tactics:  one-exercise-per-bodypart training.      When I first began to lift weights seriously (which was sometime in my high-school years; I'm 35 now, so you do the math), the bodybuilders that I loved were the ones that—even then—were considered the "old-timers."  I remember seeing pictures of Freddy Ortiz, Don Howorth (above), and Marvin Eder; I was amazed by their look.  For one, they definitely looked strong (which they were), but they also had excellent size, shape, and symmetry—small waists, large calves, boulder-sized shoulders; the whole "x-frame" look.  But—and I think this is what I still love about them—they didn't appear to be cardboard cutouts of one another.  They all had different "looks."  They were