Skip to main content

Old Time Mass Tactics: One-Exercise-Per-Bodypart Training


     Starting with the current post, I thought I would do a mini-series on how the "old-time" bodybuilders used to train.  In doing so, I also thought I would start with what I consider the greatest of the old-time mass tactics:  one-exercise-per-bodypart training.

     When I first began to lift weights seriously (which was sometime in my high-school years; I'm 35 now, so you do the math), the bodybuilders that I loved were the ones that—even then—were considered the "old-timers."  I remember seeing pictures of Freddy Ortiz, Don Howorth (above), and Marvin Eder; I was amazed by their look.  For one, they definitely looked strong (which they were), but they also had excellent size, shape, and symmetry—small waists, large calves, boulder-sized shoulders; the whole "x-frame" look.  But—and I think this is what I still love about them—they didn't appear to be cardboard cutouts of one another.  They all had different "looks."  They were shapely and symmetrical, sure, but they were also their own men.  You just don't see that kind of unique-ness in today's bodybuilding world.

     One of the most common training techniques that the old-timers used was "one-exercise-per-bodypart" training.  If they didn't utilize one exercise for each bodypart, then they rarely used more than two.  I remember reading an article by Reg Park—another of the greats—where he said that he never did more than two-exercises per muscle group in the off-season.  He saved all the pumping, toning, multi-angular stuff with a lot of exercises for the weeks before a bodybuilding contest.
     This kind of training has several benefits.  The first is its simplicity.  You just take an exercise and bang away at it until you either 1) perform your desired number of sets, or 2) get the desired "pump" in the muscle group(s) you are training.
     Another factor is that it allows you to get such a good pump.  I'm afraid that "pump" training has got a bit of a bad rap in some articles as of late—even in two of my favorite sites: T-Nation and Dragon Door.  I understand the grumbling.  You shouldn't train solely for the pump, especially if you are using weights that are too light or if you haven't established a firm base of muscle through heavy, basic training.  However, if you are training with the appropriate amount of weight, then the pump is a pretty good indicator of muscle growth.  It's definitely the measurement indicator-of-choice that the old-timers used in order to assess whether or not they were getting a good workout.
     And one-exercise-per-bodypart training definitely allows you to get a better pump than other training methods.  In fact, how many times have you been training on an exercise, getting a good pump, and then you begin to lose your pump when you switch to another movement?  If you're like me, then the answer is more times than you can count.  But you don't have that problem with one-exercise-per-bodypart training.

     When you first begin with this kind of training, I recommend sticking with a pre-planned set/rep format.  The most common—and the ones I am going to recommend—would either be a 6 sets of 6 format, an 8 sets of 8 format, or a 10 sets of 10 regimen.  If you are already an advanced lifter, then you might want to consider a "wave-loading" pattern, as well.  For this, you would start your first workout with 10 sets of 5, the next workout would be 10 sets of 4, and the third workout would be 10 sets of 3.  With each workout, you would—of course—add weight.  When beginning, however, use one of the first three set/rep options.
     For each muscle group, pick 3 or 4 exercises that are effective—for you—at building up that particular muscle group.  Rotate exercises every 2 to 3 workouts.
     A good program might look like the following:
Monday: Squats - 10 sets of 10 reps; Lying Leg Curls - 8 sets of 8 reps
Tuesday: Bench Presses - 10 sets of 10 reps; Wide Grip Chins - 6 sets of 6 reps
Wednesday: Standing Dumbbell Overhead Presses - 8 sets of 8 reps; Barbell Curls alternated with Lying Floor Extensions - 8 sets of 8 reps (each exercise)
     On Thursday, you would take the day off.  If you feel well rested on Friday, then repeat the cycle.  If not, then wait 'til Saturday before starting it over again.  Use the same exercises for your next three days of training before swapping to a new set of exercises on the following 3-day split.

Comments

  1. Just had one question. I have been weight lifting for a few months now. I have found it most effective (for me) to do upper body weights 3 days a week, and lower body weights 3 days a week (alternating days) then resting on Sunday. I have also found it effective to only do ONE exercise (with desired weight, sets, and reps) per muscle group. For example, for the biceps I perform X sets of X reps at X weight every other day. I have done this for each muscle I want to improve, and it's worked amazingly. Here's my question(s): There are a few weight lifting activities that work certain muscle groups, but I am unsure of which activities work which muscles. Please tell me which muscle is (mainly) worked when you have 2 dumbells, holding one in each fist at shoulder level, lifting them both up simultaneously (touching or almost touching them at the top above your head) then bringing them back down to shoulder level. What is the primary purpose of that activity? Also, standing straight up with a barbell in hands, at chest level, and pushing straight up (extending hands fully) then bringing the barbell back down to chest level (then obviously repeating it for desired reps & sets). What muscle does that primarily target? Thank you very much for your help.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really liked your article and your explanation of the training, thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for sharing this with us! Some really amazing features.

    powerhouse clothing

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Feel free to leave us some feedback on the article or any topics you would like us to cover in the future! Much Appreciated!

Popular posts from this blog

Marvin Eder’s Mass-Building Methods

  The Many and Varied Mass-Building Methods of Power Bodybuilding’s G.O.A.T. Eder as he appeared in my article "Full Body Workouts" for IronMan  magazine.      In many ways, the essay you are now reading is the one that has had the “longest time coming.”  I have no clue why it has taken me this long to write an article specifically on Marvin Eder, especially considering the fact that I have long considered him the greatest bodybuilder cum strength athlete of all friggin’ time .  In fact, over 20 years ago, I wrote this in the pages of IronMan magazine: In my opinion, the greatest all-around bodybuilder, powerlifter and strength athlete ever to walk the planet, Eder had 19-inch arms at a bodyweight of 198. He could bench 510, squat 550 for 10 reps and do a barbell press with 365. He was reported to have achieved the amazing feat of cranking out 1,000 dips in only 17 minutes. Imagine doing a dip a second for 17 minutes. As Gene Mozee once put it, “Modern bodybuilders couldn’t

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Don Howorth's Formula for Wide, Massive Shoulders Vintage picture of Don Howorth in competition shape. I can't remember the first time I laid eyes on Howorth's massive physique with those absolutely friggin' awesomely shaped "cannonball" shoulders of his, but it was probably sometime in the late '80s and early '90s, when I read about him in either IronMan Magazine  or MuscleMag International .  IronMan  had regular "Mass from the Past" articles written by Gene Mozee that had a couple of articles about Howorth's training*, and he was also mentioned fairly regularly in Vince Gironda's column for MuscleMag  not to mention in some of the articles of Greg Zulak for the same publication. There is no doubt that genetics played a big role in just how fantastic Howorth's delts looked, but to claim Howorth's results were just because of genetics or anabolic steroids - as I've read claimed on some internet forums - is a l

Classic Bodybuilding: The Natural Power-Bodybuilding Methods of Chuck Sipes

Chuck Sipes as he appeared in the pages of the original Ironman Magazine. For a while now, I have wanted to write a piece on one of my favorite bodybuilders of all time: Chuck Sipes. I had relented in doing so until now only because there are so many good pieces that you can find on the internet just from doing a cursory search. But I finally figured, you know, what the hell, you can never have too much Chuck Sipes. Also, in addition to my own memories and thoughts on Sipes' totally bad-a training, I've tried to find some of the best information from various sites, and include a lot of that here. For those of you that don't know much about Sipes, he was one of a kind. I know that's a bit cliché, and I've used such terms before when it comes to other "classic bodybuilders", but there was nothing cliché about Sipes, so it's completely true in this instance. Don't believe me? Then read on. First off, he was natural. In fact, he was one of the l