Skip to main content

Thursday Throwback: REAL High-Intensity Training

     If you don't know already, I'm really not a fan of what is commonly called "H.I.T." training, and I'm REALLY not a fan of Mike Mentzer.  However, this doesn't mean that I have a problem with H.I.T. training as it was initially conceived.  What follows is a post I did around ten years ago that I thought would be good to re-post as a Thursday Throwback, especially since I have noticed a small resurgence of interest in Mentzer.

REAL H.I.T.

 Make Real Gains with Brief, Intense Workout Programs

The back of Dorian Yates, probably the best-built  ALL TIME of any H.I.T. proponent.

     For years now, high intensity training (commonly referred to as H.I.T.) has been one of the most controversial training methods in the bodybuilding world.  The proponents of H.I.T. seem to think that it’s the only method capable of truly transforming the “average”, drug-free bodybuilder.  On the other side you have proponents of volume workouts (one such proponent has been myself) that seem to think that H.I.T. training is the bane of bodybuilding existence.  So which one is correct?  Well, I believe that the answer is “both” and “neither.”  Confused?  Read on and I’m going to attempt to straighten everything out, and then I’m going to outline some brief, intense workouts that actually do produce real-world results.

The Rise and Fall of H.I.T. Principles

     In the beginning of the barbell, strength-training universe—we’re talking early twentieth century—almost all of the physiques and the strength gains were built with fairly brief, fairly intense workouts.  Old-time strongmen and bodybuilders built their strength and physiques with full-body workouts, commonly performing these workouts in just three days per week.  Most of the time, they rarely performed more than 3 to 5 sets per bodypart and they kept their repetitions fairly low.  Over time, they would slowly add sets and exercises to their programs, but they would take their time doing this and they would still perform three-days-per-week, full-body workout sessions.
     This kind of training worked, and worked really well.  It produced some of the greatest physiques (and strong physiques) of all time.  Men such as John Grimek, Steve Reeves, and Reg Park trained in this manner.
     In time, the volume grew and grew.  Split workouts and steroids were introduced to the scene, and it didn’t take long before the brief, hard, intense full-body programs of the old-time lifters was all but gone and forgotten.
     Enter the ‘70s, and such men as Arthur Jones, Ellington Darden, Mike Mentzer, and Casey Viator (infamous prodigy of the Colorado Experiment).  From these men—Jones in particular—H.I.T. arose, preaching such things as full-body workouts (once again), heavy training, minimum sets (usually 3 to 4 per bodypart), and (here is the most important factor of them all) really hard work.  For the men—and women, I suppose—who decided to take up this form of (new?) training, there was little doubt: these programs worked.  Gains were made in almost record time for many H.I.T. trainees.  Brief, intense, full-body workouts were back in vogue.  (And rightly so.)
     But—as things inevitably do—it all went awry.  Minimum sets of 3 or 4 began to give way to only one set for each bodypart.  Full-body, 3-days-per-week workouts gave way to 2-day-per-week workouts where the body was—to make things even worse—split into 2 different sessions.  (At one point, some H.I.T. proponents even started to preach once-weekly workout sessions, where you would train each bodypart only once every 2 weeks.)  And leading this charge was Mike Mentzer, preaching the gospel of some crazed, pseudo-intellectual Ayn Rand-esque philosophy of his own making, determined to prove once-and-for-all that his brand of H.I.T. was the only form of training in the muscle-building multi-verse.
     Sane, hard, reasonable training had given way to a group of muscle-less H.I.T. enthusiasts whose grasp of reality and the bodybuilding truth of big muscles was anything but sane and reasonable.  Their form of growing muscles worked in their minds, but did very little in the real world of actually gaining muscle mass.
     But it doesn’t have to be this way.  The kind of training that worked for the old-time strongmen of the early twentieth century and worked for the early H.I.T. explorers of the 1970s can still work today.  It’s time to resurrect real high-intensity training.
The Rules of Real H.I.T.
     First things first: Many H.I.T. enthusiasts probably won’t approve of what I’m branding “high-intensity.”  That’s fine with me.  The training I’m advocating is for guys (and gals) who actually want to grow big and strong, not just sit around and talk about it.
     What follows are the “rules” for my brand of high-intensity training.  Take these rules seriously or don’t grow muscles at your own peril.
Rule #1: Perform Full-Body Workouts.  For some time now, I’ve been touting the efficacy of full-body workouts.  When performed properly, there is simply nothing like them when it comes to producing real-world results in terms of both muscle mass and strength gains.
Rule #2: Perform Basic, Compound Movements.  For full-body workouts to be effective, you have to choose the correct exercises.  Dumbbell curls, sissy squats, and push-ups are not going to cut it.  Instead, you need squats, deadlifts, chins, bench presses, overhead presses, rows, cleans, snatches, barbell curls; well, you get the picture.
Rule #3: Keep the Reps Fairly Low.  In other words, you need to train friggin’ heavy.  Sets of 10 to 12 reps—or worse, sets of 20 reps like a lot of H.I.T. proponents recommend—are not going to get the job done.  Sets of 5 to 8 reps—and occasionally lower—need to be staples of your training.  (Save the high-rep stuff for one or two sets at the end of the workout.)
Rule #3: Utilize a Limited Number of Exercises.  You really don’t need more than 3 to 5 exercises per workout to get your muscles growing.  Workout routines that utilize more than this—even if they’re not H.I.T. workouts—are overkill.
      The program presented here will have you doing 3 exercises per workout, plus a finishing movement at the end of the session.
Rule #4: Train Frequently Enough to Elicit Gains.  One of the good things about Jones’s programs in the ‘70s was that he had his lifters train their entire bodies three days each week.  That’s frequently enough to elicit gains.  When training all-out, I like to rotate between weeks with 3 days of training and weeks with 2 days of training.

Real H.I.T. Mass-Building

     I think you’ve been reading long enough.  Let’s get down to the nitty-gritty, the reason you started reading this article in the first place: some real-world workouts.
     The following mass-building program is for those of you who have been training at least a few months, are ready to give some serious workouts an actual try.  Stick with this program religiously for the next two to three months, and you might be quite surprised at just how much muscle you pack on your frame.
     This program contains 5 different workouts spread out over 2 weeks.

Day One

Squats: 5 progressively heavier sets of 5 reps.  The last set should be all-out—high-intensity, in other words.  If your max for 5 reps is 315 pounds, then your set/rep progression should look something like this: 135x5, 175x5, 225x5, 275x5, 315x5
Incline Bench Presses: 5 progressively heavier sets of 5 reps.  The same methodology as the squats applies to this exercise.
Close-Grip Chins: 3 sets of maximum reps.  Use your bodyweight on this exercise, and take each set to momentary muscular failure.
Dumbbell Bench Presses: 1 or 2 sets of maximum reps.  Here is where the high-rep stuff comes into play.  Pick a weight where you should reach momentary muscular failure somewhere around the 20th rep.  One set should probably be enough for a lot of you, but don’t be afraid to add another.
Day Two: Rest
Day Three
Deadlifts: 5 progressively heavier sets of 5 reps. If your max for 5 reps is 315 pounds, then your set/rep progression should look something like this: 135x5, 175x5, 225x5, 275x5, 315x5
Weighted Dips: 5 Progressively heavier sets of 5 reps.  Same methodology of progressively heavier sets as the deadlifts.
Overhead Barbell Presses: 5 progressively heavier sets of 5 reps.  Same methodology as the deadlifts and dips.
Trap Bar Deadlifts or Dumbbell Deadlifts: 1 or 2 sets of maximum reps.  If you have access to one, use a trap bar on this lift.  If not, then use a heavy pair of dumbbells. Pick a weight where you should reach momentary muscular failure somewhere around the 20th rep.
Day Four: Rest
Day Five: Repeat Day One
     At this point, you want to make sure that you’re resting two or three days before training again.  Most of you will do best by resting just two days.  This is preferable since it allows you to train on set days each week, say Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.  When you do train again, start off with the day three workout, and repeat in the same manner.  Also, don’t be afraid to add a rest day occasionally whenever you feel it might be necessary—just don’t overdo it.
     I wouldn’t recommend following these workouts for the rest of your training life.  For one, I would find such a thing boring-as-hell.  For another, your body needs variety in order to continue to grow bigger and stronger.  So give your body what it needs.
     Training is an art, not a science (although science is definitely involved), so make sure that you change exercises—or even add exercises—as you see fit.  For instance, if you feel as if you need some direct arm work, then don’t be afraid to add a few sets of barbell curls at the end of one workout, and a few sets of skullcrushers at the end of another.
     Now get your ass to the gym, train heavy, train hard-as-hell, and resurrect some real high-intensity training.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fast, Lift, Run, Eat

       Before we get things started here, I haven’t been able to write quite as much as I want to on the blog.  I have been busy, as with a great many of you, in all likelihood, with various holiday functions and I have been trying to put the finishing touches on a book I have been working on for almost two years—and should have had finished by now—on Miyamoto Musashi’s “The Dokkodo.”  However, I will try to post at least one more essay/article—possibly two—to round out 2024.      With that little aside out of the way, let’s get down to business. I had a question from a reader who wanted to know if I knew of any training program that was capable of both building muscle and burning bodyfat at the same time.  If you’re unaware, it’s widely considered damn-near impossible to achieve that feat.  Even guys on anabolics have a problem with doing such a thing, although the introduction of steroids, and other perfor...

Specialization Training

  Some Thoughts on How and When to Follow Specialization Programs Whether You’re Trying to Improve the Size of a Bodypart or Increase the Strength on a Specific Lift      This morning, I sat down with the intention of cranking out an article I had in mind for strength-specialization on a certain lift.  But, as I was working on it, I started to think that perhaps I should just write a “general” essay regarding my thoughts on when and how to go about setting up a specialization program.  The result is what you’re now staring at—I’ll save the other article I had in mind for another day.  (Hopefully, at least.  I forget more articles, unfortunately, than I actually write.)      First things first, for the most part you shouldn’t follow specialization programs the majority of the training year.  Specialization programs are needed when one of your lifts is falling behind the others—or if you’ve never really focus...

The Full-Body Big Barbell 5 Program

An 8-Week Program for Monstrous Mass and Power Gains      Over the years, I have often received the following question from a reader (though it comes in various guises): “If you could only do one exercise for the rest of your life, what would it be?”  I understand the question.  Or, at least, I understand where the question comes from.  Readers simply want to know what exercise I deem the best.      The truth is that I never really answer that question.  Mainly because I just don’t understand it. On what planet would I live where I could only do one exercise?  But as said, I do understand the rationale for the question in the first place.  And the answer I usually give is something along the lines of this: “Well, I don’t know about one exercise, but if I could only do a handful, they would be these (fill-in-the-blank).”  And the truth is, if I’m being quite honest, that I don’t always give the same ex...