Skip to main content

The Budo That Can’t Be Seen

 I haven't written any "budo philosophy" pieces of late because, well, they don't get near as many views as my essays on old-school strength training, powerlifting, and bodybuilding.  But I enjoy writing them, and, to be quite honest, I think they're some of the better essays here on my blog.  The idea for this one had been churning away in my mind for a few weeks, so I thought it was time to put pen to paper and see what comes of it.  I hope you find it, at the very least, to be an interesting take on an "obscure" subject:

The Budo That Can’t Be Seen


“Do the budo that can’t be seen,” ~Morihei Ueshiba


“It is bad for those who are learning Zen to become like those who are studying Zen but do not sit.  After all, you must have the discipline to sit everyday.” ~Omori Sogen


     The first quote comes from the founder of Aikido, also known as O-Sensei, and it’s the primary thing I want to discuss in this essay: how one does the budo that can’t be seen, and some thoughts on different ways that this can be applied.

     The second quote comes from Omori Sogen, one of the few Zen masters of the 20th century who was also a legitimate budo master of the Jikishinkage-ryĹ« school of Japanese swordsmanship.  The two quotes may not seem at first read to have much to do with one another.  But I want to turn to the 2nd quote first in order to lead us to learn to do the budo that can’t be seen.

     What Sogen says of Zen is also true of budo.  Many martial practitioners—though I’m not sure how much the term “practitioner” can really apply here—play at budo through study but not practice.  Oh, they might come to class, go through the motions, enjoy training in the dojo, and, on occasion, have some hard training sessions.  But they mainly “know” a lot.  It’s the reason for their interest in budo in the first place, to acquire knowledge.  They enjoy studying budo.  They may study everything about their style, in fact.  Sometimes, they even “look” good—technical kata, clean technique.  But it’s not truly real.  It’s not deep enough.  It can, in a couple of words, be seen.  To practice that which can’t be seen requires diligent practice, constant practice, unwavering practice until true budo emerges.

     There can be confusion here because it seems as if some who practice harder, more diligently, even more “correctly” are not as skilled, not as “good,” as those who don’t practice as much but seem to know a lot of things about their particular art.  But what we see is often no more than what is on the surface.  A budoka may not be as naturally skilled, and she may not have all the knowledge as some of her fellow practitioners, but if she continues to practice hard enough—not study—her techniques will eventually look as technically proficient as her fellow classmates.  But her budo is not the same, looks aside.  It’s deeper.  It has been forged in the fire of practice that her fellow budoka—naturally more talented, more inherently “gifted”—will never understand.  It simply can’t be seen by the majority, other budoka included.

     You see this in Zen, as well.  One practitioner may not have studied as much, and might not even know all the terms that his fellow practitioners know with ease, but he practices more, intent on seeing, and therefore knowing, the truth of Zen, not just intellectually understand it.  And when he does see, he now sees the very thing the other practitioners have discussed—he realizes that some of their explanations were even quite accurate—but he knows in a way they can’t know because they haven’t seen it.  Because what he sees—even though they “see” the same thing—is more, deeper, and below the surface.  Many may look upon the ocean in its majestic, wondrous beauty and they all know, at least intellectually, what is below the surface.  All can talk about it.  Some can explain it eloquently, but he sees and knows, even if he can never really put it into words.

     Omori Sogen had a more down-to-earth manner of expressing this same idea: “We often have visitors, some of whom have evidently read widely on Zen Buddhism, who like to discuss different theoretical problems.  Judging from their words, they seem to be great Zen men, but most of them have not sat enough for their vital buttocks to be familiar with their Zen cushions.”

     You encounter this relatively often in the dojo.  Visitors will come, spout their training credentials, and spend plenty of time discussing intricate theoretical locks, grabs, throws, blocks, and strikes.  But they still can’t stop a roundhouse kick even when you explain to them that your left foot is about to connect with the right side of their head.  That kind of budo—the ability to have your way even when your opponent knows what’s coming—is another kind of budo that can’t be seen.  It can’t be seen by others because they have never experienced it.  That’s because this kind of skill requires a combination of speed and strength, brought on by perfection of technique through constant practice, that can’t be understood if the training to acquire it hasn’t been undertaken.

     It also requires something else: a confidence that is conveyed in one’s “energy,” one’s presence so that the opponent has lost before the confrontation has even begun.  This point might seem odd to those who practice Zen but not a martial way.  It is an essential skill, however, if your life is ever on the line in a real combat situation.  You must be able to convey that confident presence to the street.  If you aren’t capable of that in the walls of the dojo, you won’t be able to do it in the open air of a street encounter.

     But Zen training does have its equivalents, as when one “resolves to know the great matter of life and death,” or if you commit to “die before you die.”  If those pithy sayings are to have any meaning at all, then one’s Zen practice must at the very least acquire the same seriousness as a bout in the dojo.  In many ways, Zen training is more serious, much more.  You train for the potentiality of death within the dojo.  You train for the eventuality of death in the zendo.

     The primary reason most never acquire a budo of this level is because they try to acquire it, they try their utmost to seize upon it.  But it is only achieved—if it’s ever achieved at all—through, ironically perhaps, not trying to achieve it.  You let go of the goal of integration and focus on the path.  The path itself becomes the goal.  The path is the goal.

     This means the only way to truly acquire this unseen aspect is to give yourself completely to your practice.  In time, this unseen aspect will emerge.  But you have to be diligent, even if there comes a time when it seems as if it will never emerge.  Yet it is often at the point when one is willing to give up, perhaps even to the point of despair, that diligent practice is most needed.  It might sound cliche, but it truly is darkest before the dawn.

     You must simply stay at it, give yourself completely to your practice, go through the darkness and, eventually, true budo emerges from within you.  It can’t be seen.  It can only be known.  You won’t be capable of explaining it to others, though others might see it in you, even if they themselves do not understand what it is they encounter in your presence.

     The words here are only pointers, however.  You must focus on your practice above all else.   With that, I will leave you with the words of Bruce Lee (paraphrasing the Zen poet-monk Ryokan): “It's like a finger pointing away to the moon. Don't concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory.”  



Sources

“Striking Thoughts: Bruce Lee’s Wisdom for Daily Living,” by Bruce Lee and John Little (editor)

“Introduction to Zen Training: A Physical Approach to Meditation and Mind-Body Training,” by Omori Sogen


Comments

  1. Usually but not always , one must do to understand

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have only a passing familiarity with Eastern philosophy (mostly Daoist), but my understanding is that in the practices of quietness, the more you say, the less you explain. And that's why we have koans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that is fairly correct, although you have koans more to "see" your True Nature than necessarily to achieve quiessence. I have even thought of the practice of budo itself as a koan in a way. Assuming you "enter into it" completely, as you must do with a koan. I must admit to never "formally" training in koans, either, as they are usually the domain of the Rinzai school of Zen, and I was trained in a very Soto-like dojo where we practiced shikantaza, or "just sitting." If you are after quietness, or stillness, of mind, may I suggest that the HWADU might be better at achieving that than a koan.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for your reply. It is clear that you are far beyond me in this - I'd never heard of Hwadu until you mentioned it.

    I will add one other thought: In Aristotelian thought, all Nature has a nature, and things behave the way they do in order to fulfil their nature. For mankind, happiness results from acting in accordance with our nature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that "happiness results from acting in accordance with our nature" is perfectly in accord with Zen (and certainly Taoist) thought, as well. I find great congruence between Chinese philosophical thought and Greek thought, to be honest.

      As for the hwadu method, if that's something you're interested in studying more, may I suggest reading some of the Korean Son (Zen) masters, particularly Chinul. For different reasons, of which I won't get into here, the Koreans took the hwadu method the most serious. A good modern book that is almost entirely about hwadu practice is "The Way of Korean Zen" by Kusan Sunim.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Feel free to leave us some feedback on the article or any topics you would like us to cover in the future! Much Appreciated!

Popular posts from this blog

Bill Starr’s Midlife Muscle Builder

Advice from Bill Starr (and Myself) for the Midlife Bodybuilders and Lifters      Last week, I overdid it.  I should know better.  Actually, I do know better.  But, like all former elite athletes I’ve ever met with decades of training under their lifting belts, there are workouts and weeks when I decide to do a little too much—train too heavy, do cardio that is  way too intense—if nothing than to see if I can still handle it.  Kinda stupid, I know.  But I still do it.  And every time that I do this, reality comes crashing back down to earth and I know I need to settle into a kinder, gentler training routine.  How do I know I overdid it?  Because I hurt like hell in my joints and pretty much want to take a nap all day long instead of staring at this computer screen and writing the very thing that you’re now reading.      If you’re in your 40s and 50s, and have trained for a considerable amo...

The High-Frequency 6x6-8 Regimen

  Another High-Frequency Hypertrophy Program for the Natural Lifter      I write a lot about high-frequency training (HFT).  I think on average—assuming the lifter has the time to make it to the gym frequently—it’s the best form of training for the natural lifter or bodybuilder.  When I first started writing about this form of training—which I have been doing now for more than 20 years, perhaps longer—my programs mainly focused on strength training or strength training along with concomitant mass gains.  Recently, however, I have created more and more hypertrophy programs using these methods.  Part of that probably has to do with the fact that I have personally been using HFT for my own physique goals.  As I am not getting any younger, my body often can’t handle the heavy weights that I used to enjoy training with, but it can handle high-frequency when done with “reasonable” weights.      There are differen...

Heavy and High

  An Essay for the Natural Lifter or Bodybuilder Read on and Discover One of the Secrets to Massive Muscles      Over the years, it has often been debated—on gym floors, discussion forums, and among bodybuilding trainers and strength coaches—whether hypertrophy is built via heavy weights or through high reps.  The debate was there when I first picked up a barbell almost 40 years ago and it’s still debated to this very day.  Now, we’re not talking about strength or performance here—heavy weight and low reps has, and always will, reign supreme in that domain—but, rather, strictly muscle growth.  Both camps have their proponents and their detractors.  On the “heavy side” of the camp, you have bodybuilders like “Brutal” Bertil Fox*, who built some of the thickest, most herculean mass possible and whose favorite method of training consisted of doing 3 exercises for each muscle group for 3 sets of 3 reps each.  And on the opposite side yo...