Skip to main content

The Heavy-Light-Medium System for Low-Volume Lifters

     Since I had my most recent article published at Dragon Door ("The Heavy-Light-Medium System for Strength and Power"), I have received a few e-mails from lifters with a wide range of questions.  I thought I would use this post—and some later ones—to answer some of those questions and to help some of you lifters who might need to adapt the system to fit your particular needs.
     This post will deal with adapting the system for "low-volume" lifters.  First, let's categorize what a low-volume lifter is, then we can get on to designing an actual workout.  When it comes to the heavy-light-medium system I categorize a low-volume lifter as a lifter who 1) responds well to workouts that contain less volume (most lifters respond well to moderate-volume, and some—about the same number of lifters who respond well to low-volume, in case you're wondering— respond well to high-volume), and 2) gets stronger on the top-set of a core lift with a relatively low number of progressively heavier sets.
     I first discovered this category of lifters on this system myself a few years back.  I was training with three other powerlifters, and we decided to start using a version of the heavy-light-medium system while training for an upcoming meet.  Since all of us were relatively advanced strength-wise (pound-for-pound I was the strongest, but all of my training partners were as strong as me, if not stronger—they just weighed more), I decided it would be best if we trained with a moderate to high amount of volume.
     All of us got good gains out of the program for the first few weeks except my best friend Puddin'.  (Puddin', in case some of you don't understand this, is a very southern redneck nickname—and my buddy is the only person I know with the name; I assume there are other Puddins out there in the redneck universe, but I could be wrong.)  Puddin' actually got weaker on all of his core lifts except for his squat.  He didn't get weaker on his squat, but his numbers didn't go up on it either; just stagnated.
     At first, this didn't compute.  Puddin' was the strongest of all of us.  He  weighed over 300 pounds at a height of 5'9", could bench press more than 450 pounds raw, could squat 600 pounds raw, and could deadlift around 500 pounds.  (He was too short and his arms too stubby to have a really big pull.)  He was also—considering his weight—in really good shape.  After all, he was capable of doing about 20 reps on dips—really good considering his size—and could do quite a lot of reps on chins.  But then I got to thinking.  He was also bad about drinking too much beer, and laying off from the garage gym once every three or four weeks or so.  He was also known to show up to our workouts having already drank far too many beers—which usually meant he wasn't going to do near the workload as the rest of us.  And you know what?  He always progressed as fast as the rest of us did.
     With this revelation, I made a decision.  I had him cut out all of his assistance work.  He went from 5 to 6 sets of progressively heavier sets of 5 or 3 reps to only 3 to 4 sets of 3 to 5 reps.  Also, I had him cut out all lower back work on his "light" day.
     Lo and behold—you know what happened?  His lifts skyrocketed.  And he soon broke all his personal bests.
     Puddin' was definitely a low-volume lifter.

     Here is an example of what a heavy-light-medium workout should look like for low-volume lifters.  Keep in mind that when the program says 4 sets of 5 or 3 sets of 5 on a "core" lift, this means 4 or 3 progressively heavier sets of 5 reps.  The last set should be "all-out."  Although you want to get all 5 reps, 6 should be impossible if you were to attempt it.

Monday (Heavy)
Squats: 4 sets of 5 reps
Deadlifts: 3 sets of 5 reps
Incline Bench Presses: 4 sets of 5 reps
ab work

Wednesday (Light)
Squats: 3 sets of 5 reps
Standing Overhead Presses: 4 sets of 5 reps
Barbell Curls: 4 sets of 5 reps
ab work

Friday (Medium)
Squats: 3 sets of 5 reps, 1 set of 3 reps (This last set of 3 reps should be with a weight heavier than your 4th set of 5 reps from Monday.)
Dips: 4 sets of 5 reps
Good-Morning Squats: 3 sets of 5 reps

     Here are a couple of other tips:
     First, don't do this program if you're a moderate-volume or high-volume lifter just because you're lazy.  This program is meant for those who actually thrive off less-volume.
     If you're a moderate to high-volume lifter but you work a job that requires a lot of heavy manual labor (construction worker, for instance), then this program is good for you in this case.
     This program is also good for moderate to high-volume lifters who are athletes and are "in-season."  The workload is low enough that you should still be able to perform your other workouts for your sport and compete in your chosen sport.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Before we get started on this "Classic Bodybuilding" piece, one word of note:  If you really  pay attention to this blog, then you will notice that in the "sub-header" at the top of the page, I have added "Ageless Bodybuilding" as one of the subjects that will be discussed.  This is for a decided reason... I have been developing a system of training that I have been using on myself and a few "older" lifters that occasionally train with me, but still follow my training program that I have them using even when they are training at a commercial gym instead of my "garage gym".  This system is for those of you who are 40+ such as myself, but it may be even more effective for those of you 50 and older.  In fact, of my two occasional training partners, one of them is 51, and the other is 55. I wouldn't be so arrogant as to call this ageless bodybuilding system  revolutionary, but I can say that it is radically different from most syste

Old School Arm Training Secrets: John McWilliams's Arm Training Routine

Old-School Arm Training Secrets: John McWilliams’s Arm Routine      My most popular posts here at Integral Strength typically fall into two categories: old-school bodybuilding programs or serious strength and power routines.      With that in mind, I thought I would do a series of articles on various old-school lifters and bodybuilders (the two overlapped once-upon-a-time), and on various old-school methods for training different bodyparts or lifts.   Thus, this first entry is on old-school arm training, but others will be on old-school chest, shoulders, back, legs, squats, bench presses, overhead presses, power cleans, etc.   And for this first entry, I decided upon an old-school bodybuilder cum powerlifter that many of you may never have heard of: John McWilliams. McWilliams's back double-biceps pose.  He was impressive even in his 40s.      When I first came across an article about McWilliams (written by Gene Mozee) in the early ‘90s, I had certainly neve

Old Time Mass Tactics: One-Exercise-Per-Bodypart Training

     Starting with the current post, I thought I would do a mini-series on how the "old-time" bodybuilders used to train.  In doing so, I also thought I would start with what I consider the greatest of the old-time mass tactics:  one-exercise-per-bodypart training.      When I first began to lift weights seriously (which was sometime in my high-school years; I'm 35 now, so you do the math), the bodybuilders that I loved were the ones that—even then—were considered the "old-timers."  I remember seeing pictures of Freddy Ortiz, Don Howorth (above), and Marvin Eder; I was amazed by their look.  For one, they definitely looked strong (which they were), but they also had excellent size, shape, and symmetry—small waists, large calves, boulder-sized shoulders; the whole "x-frame" look.  But—and I think this is what I still love about them—they didn't appear to be cardboard cutouts of one another.  They all had different "looks."  They were