Skip to main content

3 Exercise, Full-Body Split Workouts

The Benefits of Full-Body Workouts 
    As anyone who reads this blog—or any of my articles—knows, I'm a big fan of full-body workout programs.  I'm a fan of them for a number of reasons: they allow you to train your muscle groups frequently (yes, dammit, that's a good thing!), they allow you to train your muscles frequently without being in the gym all the time, and they act as a sort of anabolic "trigger"—stimulating muscle growth throughout your entire body better than split workout programs.
     Don't get me wrong.  I am in no way opposed to split training programs.  If you look throughout this blog you'll find a number of good workout suggestions and routines that use a split schedule.  Also, if you read past article of mine from 10 years back or so—mainly in Iron Man magazine and MuscleMag International—you will discover back then that I recommended split workouts almost exclusively.

Strength Coaches, Personal Trainers, Writers, and Their Personal Efficacy
     Here's the thing: I recommend that—after laying a good foundation during your first year of training by using almost exclusive full-body workouts—you experiment with different training splits.  Two-way splits, three-way splits, four-way splits, one-muscle-group-per workout splits, double-splits—you name it, I recommend that you try it.
     But if you're going to do so, you need a good strength coach or personal trainer that understands the territory.  (Preferably this trainer/coach should be able to train you in person; if not, find someone—such as myself—on the internet that understands how to apply his/her training principles.)  If a strength coach/trainer doesn't know how to use a particular split and/or full-body program, then they aren't of much use.  And, yes, some trainers are very good at making split workouts programs "work" and some are not.  The same goes for full-body workouts.
     Myself, I understand full-body workouts.  I have used them on myself and others in order to gain lots of muscle, garner plenty of strength, train for powerlifting competitions, etc.

3 Exercise, Full-Body Split Workout Programs
     Which brings us around to the subject of this post: 3 exercise, full-body split workouts.
     There are a number of full-body workouts that are effective depending on your physique, your training experience, and your training goals.  Solely for the sake of gaining muscle mass, I like this particular form of training.
     Here's how it works:
     Train three days each week (say, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday).  On each day, pick either a lower-body pushing exercise or a lower-body pulling exercise.  Also, pick one upper body pushing exercise and one upper body pulling exercise for each session.  At each workout session, rotate exercises.  On each exercise, perform 5 to 8 sets for 5 to 8 reps.
     A week of workouts might look like this:
Monday
Deadlifts: 8 sets of 5 reps
Wide-Grip Chins: 5 sets of 5 reps
Dips: 8 sets of 5 reps
Wednesday
Squats: 5 sets of 8 reps
Bent-Over Rows: 5 sets of 5 reps
Dumbbell Bench Presses: 5 sets of 8 reps
Friday
Deadlifts: 8 sets of 5 reps
Wide-Grip Chins: 5 sets of 5 reps
Dips: 8 sets of 5 reps
     On the following Monday, you would repeat the Wednesday workout.

     Not that complicated.  But highly effective.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Before we get started on this "Classic Bodybuilding" piece, one word of note:  If you really  pay attention to this blog, then you will notice that in the "sub-header" at the top of the page, I have added "Ageless Bodybuilding" as one of the subjects that will be discussed.  This is for a decided reason... I have been developing a system of training that I have been using on myself and a few "older" lifters that occasionally train with me, but still follow my training program that I have them using even when they are training at a commercial gym instead of my "garage gym".  This system is for those of you who are 40+ such as myself, but it may be even more effective for those of you 50 and older.  In fact, of my two occasional training partners, one of them is 51, and the other is 55. I wouldn't be so arrogant as to call this ageless bodybuilding system  revolutionary, but I can say that it is radically different from most syste

Old School Arm Training Secrets: John McWilliams's Arm Training Routine

Old-School Arm Training Secrets: John McWilliams’s Arm Routine      My most popular posts here at Integral Strength typically fall into two categories: old-school bodybuilding programs or serious strength and power routines.      With that in mind, I thought I would do a series of articles on various old-school lifters and bodybuilders (the two overlapped once-upon-a-time), and on various old-school methods for training different bodyparts or lifts.   Thus, this first entry is on old-school arm training, but others will be on old-school chest, shoulders, back, legs, squats, bench presses, overhead presses, power cleans, etc.   And for this first entry, I decided upon an old-school bodybuilder cum powerlifter that many of you may never have heard of: John McWilliams. McWilliams's back double-biceps pose.  He was impressive even in his 40s.      When I first came across an article about McWilliams (written by Gene Mozee) in the early ‘90s, I had certainly neve

Old Time Mass Tactics: One-Exercise-Per-Bodypart Training

     Starting with the current post, I thought I would do a mini-series on how the "old-time" bodybuilders used to train.  In doing so, I also thought I would start with what I consider the greatest of the old-time mass tactics:  one-exercise-per-bodypart training.      When I first began to lift weights seriously (which was sometime in my high-school years; I'm 35 now, so you do the math), the bodybuilders that I loved were the ones that—even then—were considered the "old-timers."  I remember seeing pictures of Freddy Ortiz, Don Howorth (above), and Marvin Eder; I was amazed by their look.  For one, they definitely looked strong (which they were), but they also had excellent size, shape, and symmetry—small waists, large calves, boulder-sized shoulders; the whole "x-frame" look.  But—and I think this is what I still love about them—they didn't appear to be cardboard cutouts of one another.  They all had different "looks."  They were