Skip to main content

The 3 to 5 Method for Strength and Muscle Mass

     On my old blog, I had an article dealing with using the 3 to 5 method for gaining muscle mass and strength.  Recently, a reader e-mailed me wanting to know if I would re-publish that one on this blog.  Unfortunately, I don't have that other blog saved, and (to be honest) I don't remember what all I wrote on that other entry.  And so... that brings us to the post you are now looking at on your computer screen.
     The 3 to 5 method became popular through the writings of Pavel Tsatsouline. (Pavel has to be, by the way, one of the most innovative writers out there when it comes to building strength, power and muscle mass; and, oh yeah, he's also the guy who singlehandedly made kettlebells popular in the states.)  Pavel's method - if I'm correct - meant performing 3 to 5 exercises for 3 to 5 sets of 3 to 5 reps.  You then trained every 3 to 5 days.
     Mine was/is a little different.  Pick 3 to 5 "core" exercises.  These should be the "more bang for your buck" movements.  You want to pick one squatting exercise, one "pulling" exercise, one exercise for your upper body "push" muscles, one exercise for your upper body "pull" muscles, and (if you so choose) one other exercise for either your arms or your ab muscles.  If you are feeling at all drained or overtrained, you can drop one or two of the above exercises and just perform 3 exercises instead of 5.
     On each exercise, perform 3 to 5 sets for 3 to 5 reps.
     Train - and here's the difference with my system - 3 to 5 days each week.  For myself, when training in this manner I enjoy working out Monday-Friday, then taking the weekends off.  Sure, I feel a little overworked and tired by Friday, but after taking Saturday and Sunday off, I feel refreshed and invigorated for Monday's session.
     Obviously, in each workout, you need to leave a little something "in the tank."  Stop each set a few reps shy of muscular failure.  And don't get "jacked up" or over energized for any of the workouts.  Relax during the workouts; taking a couple of minutes of rest between each set, and practice some deep, meditative breathing between each set, as well.
     Here is an example of what a week of training might look like:
Monday, Wednesday, Friday
Squats: 5 sets of 3 reps
Deadlifts off Blocks: 3 sets of 3 reps
Incline Bench Presses: 3 sets of 5 reps
Chins: 5 sets of 5 reps
Barbell Curls: 3 sets of 3 reps
Tuesday and Thursday
Front Squats: 3 sets of 5 reps
Flat Dumbbell Bench Presses: 3 sets of 3 reps
Bent Over Rows: 5 sets of 3 reps
Steep Incline Sit Ups (weighted): 5 sets of 5 reps
     When first training in this manner, you might want to ease into your workouts the first week.  Also, you should feel refreshed and energized after each workout; probably a lot better than when you started the session.  And don't be upset if your strength is up and down throughout the program.  Some days, you will feel a little more tired than on others.  On these days, make sure you are still performing 3 to 5 sets of 3 to 5 reps on each exercise you choose—don't shortcut yourself.  On other days, you will feel very strong—resist the urge to do more on these days and just stick with the program.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Train Easy, Repeat Often

High-Frequency Training Parameters and Programming Ideas      Yesterday, I was sitting in my garage gym—pen and paper in hand as I jotted down some different article ideas—watching my son Garrett go through a lower body session when I told him the title for this article.   I thought “Train Easy, Repeat Often” was a pretty good title.   I originally intended it to simply be the title for a workout program.      Then Garrett said, “Okay, but how easy and how often?”      I stroked my beard as I began to mull over his question and the wheels began turning in my mind.   “Good point,” I replied.   “Maybe that’s what the article should be about.   I could still outline some workout programs, but I could mainly just explain how much you should train based on how frequent you want to lift.”      Garrett gave me a thumbs up, then returned to his sumo deficit deadlifts.   I doubt ...

Classic Bodybuilding: Bill Pearl's Arm Training Secrets

  The Old-School High-Set, Low-Rep Arm Building Secrets of the Great Bill Pearl! A young Pearl flexes his peaked biceps.  At the time, he would have used a method similar—if not the same—as what is written here. The other day, in my post on "Ageless Bodybuilding for the Young," I made a brief mention on how a young Bill Pearl trained.  And, although I have done a couple of Pearl pieces in the past, I thought this might be a good time to look at his arm training "secrets" since I think Pearl had something unique to offer the muscle-building world—and still does to this day.  (Just a brief mention that Pearl will also be instrumental in explaining some of the details in my Ageless Bodybuilding System in a future post.  Pearl, in fact, had a very  unique way of training as he got older that I believe a limited number of people are actually aware of.  But I got the scoop!  And  I digress—back to this post...) A lot of what I am going to write her...

Classic Bodybuilding: Don Howorth's Massive Delt Training

Don Howorth's Formula for Wide, Massive Shoulders Vintage picture of Don Howorth in competition shape. I can't remember the first time I laid eyes on Howorth's massive physique with those absolutely friggin' awesomely shaped "cannonball" shoulders of his, but it was probably sometime in the late '80s and early '90s, when I read about him in either IronMan Magazine  or MuscleMag International .  IronMan  had regular "Mass from the Past" articles written by Gene Mozee that had a couple of articles about Howorth's training*, and he was also mentioned fairly regularly in Vince Gironda's column for MuscleMag  not to mention in some of the articles of Greg Zulak for the same publication. There is no doubt that genetics played a big role in just how fantastic Howorth's delts looked, but to claim Howorth's results were just because of genetics or anabolic steroids - as I've read claimed on some internet forums - is a l...